Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2020 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (6) TMI 301 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Challenging impugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening assessments for the Assessment Years 2010-2011 & 2011-2012 and consequential communications overruling objections.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, engaged in various businesses, challenged notices seeking to reopen assessments. The petitioner merged with another company, adjusting losses for book profit determination under Section 115JB of the Act.

2. The assessments were scrutinized, and orders were passed for the respective years. The respondent sought to reopen the returns, rejecting the petitioner's objections, citing ineligibility to adjust losses from the merged company due to lack of manufacturing activity.

3. The petitioner relied on legal precedents to challenge the reopening. The respondent argued that mere document production does not fulfill disclosure requirements under Section 147 of the Act, invoking Explanation 2 to Section 147.

4. The core reason for reopening was the alleged ineligibility to adjust losses from the transferor company due to lack of manufacturing activity, as per Section 72A(1)(a) of the Act, supported by judicial decisions.

5. The Court noted that the petitioner disclosed the merger details in the returns, and there was no suppression of facts, rendering the reopening under Section 148 without jurisdiction.

6. The Court highlighted that the proposed adjustments were based on disclosed information, violating the principle against change of opinion post-disclosure, as per legal precedents.

7. The Court directed the petitioner to participate in proceedings, preventing disturbance of adjustments made under Section 72A(1)(a) of the Act, while allowing the respondent to explore other grounds for reassessment under Explanation 3 to Section 147.

8. The Court ordered the respondent to conclude the proceedings within three months, emphasizing the need for closure on the matter related to the Assessment Years 2010-2011 & 2011-2012.

9. The Writ Petitions were disposed of with the above directives, with no costs incurred, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates