Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2021 (12) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (12) TMI 722 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to collect GST on the supply of services pertaining to the selling of agricultural produce as per the APMC Act.
2. Whether there is any special case where the applicant has to collect GST on the service provided (branded and unbranded).

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: GST on Supply of Services Pertaining to Selling of Agricultural Produce as per APMC Act

The applicant, a rice canvassing commission agent for rice millers and traders, sought an advance ruling on whether their services are exempt from GST under the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act (APMC Act). The applicant argued that their services should be exempt as they are selling agricultural produce (rice) and that rice is considered an agricultural produce under the APMC Act.

The Authority examined the definition of "agricultural produce" as per Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which states that agricultural produce means any produce out of the cultivation of plants and rearing of animals, on which either no further processing is done or such processing is done as usually done by a cultivator or producer which does not alter its essential characteristics but makes it marketable for the primary market.

The Authority found that rice, which is obtained through the milling process of paddy, does not qualify as agricultural produce because:
- The milling process involves de-husking, steaming, de-browning, polishing, sorting, etc., which are not usually done by the cultivator or producer.
- The essential characteristics of paddy are altered during the milling process, resulting in rice, husk, and rice bran, which are distinctly identifiable and marketable commodities.

Thus, the Authority concluded that rice does not qualify as agricultural produce under the said Notification, and the commission agent services for the sale or purchase of rice do not fall under the exemption provided in Sl.No. 54 of the Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate). Consequently, the applicant is liable to collect CGST @ 9% and KGST @ 9% on the supply of services relating to the sale or purchase of rice.

Issue 2: GST on Service Provided (Branded and Unbranded)

The applicant also sought clarity on whether they need to collect GST on services provided for branded and unbranded rice. The Authority reiterated that the services of a commission agent for rice millers and traders, whether for branded or unbranded rice, are taxable.

The Authority emphasized that the services provided by the applicant do not fall under the exemption category as they are not directly linked to the cultivation process but are related to the marketing of rice, which is a processed product. Therefore, the applicant is required to register under Section 22 of the CGST Act, 2017, and discharge CGST @ 9% and KGST @ 9% on the consideration received or receivable as commission from the rice miller or traders.

Ruling:

1. The applicant is liable to collect CGST @ 9% and KGST @ 9% on the supply of services relating to the sale or purchase of rice.
2. The applicant, by canvassing for branded and unbranded rice of millers and other traders, is liable to pay CGST @ 9% and KGST @ 9% on the consideration received or receivable as commission from the rice miller or traders.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates