Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (2) TMI 315 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Valuation of property for capital gains tax under Section 50C of the Income Tax Act.
2. Disallowance of improvement cost, brokerage expenses, and construction expenses.

Issue 1: Valuation of property for capital gains tax under Section 50C

The appeal pertains to the fair market value assessment of a property sold by the assessee for &8377; 4.40 crores, while the Stamp Valuation Authority valued it at &8377; 5.95 crores. The Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 50C of the Act, considering the stamp duty valuation, leading to a higher capital gains tax. The assessee objected, contending that the property was not referred to the District Valuation Officer (DVO) for fair market value determination. The DVO later valued the property at &8377; 5,98,96,000/-. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the DVO's valuation, stating the DVO's report is binding. The Tribunal found that the assessee's objections were not adequately considered by the CIT(A) or the DVO. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' orders and remanded the matter to the AO for reconsideration of the objections raised by the assessee and a fresh fair market value determination.

Issue 2: Disallowance of improvement cost, brokerage expenses, and construction expenses

The assessee raised three additional issues regarding the disallowance of improvement cost, brokerage expenses, and construction expenses. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's decision on these matters without proper consideration. As the main issue of property valuation was remanded back to the AO, the Tribunal also remanded these three issues for reconsideration. The Tribunal held that these issues could impact the determination of long-term capital gains and needed proper assessment. Consequently, the orders of the lower authorities were set aside, and these issues were sent back to the AO for detailed examination.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and remanding both the property valuation issue and the additional expense issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates