Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2022 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (5) TMI 334 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Delay in filing the appeal.
2. Nature of the trust's activities: religious vs. charitable.
3. Eligibility for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Eligibility for recognition under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The Assessee's appeal was delayed by three days due to the trustees' delay in obtaining legal advice and convening a Board of Committee meeting. The Tribunal found the delay to be due to a reasonable cause without any negligence or lack of due diligence. Consequently, the nominal delay in filing the appeal was condoned.

2. Nature of the Trust's Activities: Religious vs. Charitable:
The Assessee trust was originally created with the purpose of performing religious activities, as per the will of its founder, which included performing pooja and other religious ceremonies. However, over time, the trust expanded its objectives to include various charitable activities such as providing free food, education, and hostel facilities to students and the general public, without any discrimination based on caste, creed, or religion. The Assessee argued that the trust's activities were predominantly charitable, citing the case of M/S. Shiv Mandir Devasttan Panch Committee Sanstan vs. CIT, where it was held that worshipping deities and maintaining temples did not constitute a religious purpose but were part of a way of life.

3. Eligibility for Registration under Section 12AA:
The CIT(E) had granted the Assessee registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but categorized the trust's activities as "religious" rather than "charitable." The Tribunal noted that the trust's activities, as per the supplementary deed, were charitable and aimed at public benefit. The Tribunal emphasized that the trust did not benefit any specific religious community and that its activities were open to all, regardless of caste, creed, or religion. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Dawoodi Bohra Jamat, which held that trusts with composite objects of religious and charitable activities that benefit the public at large are eligible for registration as charitable institutions. Consequently, the Tribunal directed that the Assessee be recognized as existing for "charitable purposes."

4. Eligibility for Recognition under Section 80G:
The Assessee's application for recognition under Section 80G was rejected by the CIT(E) on the grounds that the trust was categorized as a "religious trust," and Section 80G benefits are not available to religious trusts. The Tribunal, however, noted that the Assessee's activities were predominantly charitable and did not exclusively benefit any particular religious community. The Tribunal cited the case of CIT v. Christian Medical College, which held that institutions performing charitable activities without discrimination based on caste, creed, or religion should not be denied recognition under Section 80G. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee should be treated as a charitable trust and eligible for recognition under Section 80G.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, recognizing the trust as existing for "charitable purposes" and directed that the registration under Section 12AA be granted accordingly. The Tribunal also implied that the Assessee should be eligible for recognition under Section 80G, given its charitable activities and non-discriminatory nature.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates