Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2022 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (10) TMI 1057 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 147 - order passed under Section 148A(d) - minimum time of seven days has to be granted to the assessee to file its reply to the said show cause notice - HELD THAT - As decided in Shri Sai Co-Operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd 2022 (5) TMI 1435 - DELHI HIGH COURT wherein it has been held that under Section 148A(b) of the Act, a minimum time of seven days has to be granted to the assessee to file its reply to the said show cause notice. Respondent-revenue, accepts notice. He states that the respondent-revenue has no objection, if the present matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in accordance with law. Consequently, the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) for the assessment year 2018-19 is set aside and the Assessing Officer is directed to pass a fresh reasoned order within eight weeks in accordance with law after considering the reply of the petitioner, which is directed to be re-filed within a week.
Issues:
Challenge to notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; Order under Section 148A(d) of the Act; Adequacy of response time; Ex-parte order; Compliance with statutory period; Remand for fresh decision. Analysis: The petitioner challenged a notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 14th March, 2022, along with the subsequent order under Section 148A(d) of the Act and another notice issued under Section 148 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The petitioner contended that the initial notice was received via email as an encrypted file, rendering it inaccessible. The petitioner promptly informed the respondent about this issue on the same day. However, the physical copy of the notice was received through speed post on 17th March, 2022, allowing insufficient time for response as mandated by Section 148A(b) of the Act. Despite the petitioner's request for an adjournment, the respondent proceeded to pass the order ex-parte under Section 148A(d) of the Act, without considering the communication regarding the accessibility issue. In light of the petitioner's submissions, the court referred to a previous decision and emphasized the importance of granting a minimum period of seven days for the assessee to respond to a show cause notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The respondent, represented by learned counsel, acknowledged the procedural irregularities and expressed willingness for the matter to be remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision in compliance with the law. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act for the assessment year 2018-19 and directed the Assessing Officer to issue a fresh reasoned order within eight weeks, taking into account the petitioner's reply, which was instructed to be re-filed within a week. Importantly, the court clarified that its decision did not delve into the merits of the underlying controversy, leaving the rights and contentions of all parties open. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed of.
|