Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + SC VAT and Sales Tax - 1994 (2) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1994 (2) TMI 59 - SC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Whether sales of turmeric powder and pepper powder obtained from whole turmeric and whole pepper are exigible to sales tax under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1:
The primary issue in this case is whether the sales of turmeric powder and pepper powder, derived from whole turmeric and whole pepper, are subject to sales tax under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. The appellant argued that since whole turmeric and whole pepper had already been taxed at the point of sale, the subsequent sale of turmeric powder and pepper powder should not be subject to tax. The department, however, contended that the powders were distinct goods from the whole turmeric and pepper, thus liable to tax. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue's view.

Analysis:
The appellant contended that turmeric powder and pepper powder were essentially the same goods as whole turmeric and whole pepper, citing precedents where similar items in different forms were considered the same goods. Conversely, the State of West Bengal argued that the powders were distinct goods, drawing parallels with cases where the transformation of goods led to the emergence of new products. The Court analyzed the nature of the goods and their commercial usage to determine their taxability.

Judgment:
The Court held that whole black and white pepper and pepper powder were the same goods, considering both functional and commercial parlance tests. The Notifications specifying these commodities referred to them regardless of their form, indicating their equivalence. Similarly, although turmeric and turmeric powder differed functionally, they were treated as the same goods due to the language used in the Notifications. The Court rejected the State's argument based on the use of "that is to say" in the Notifications, emphasizing that it did not signify a distinction between the goods and their forms. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, setting aside the Tribunal's judgment with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates