Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 1996 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1996 (2) TMI 136 - HC - Central Excise

  1. 2015 (5) TMI 371 - SC
  2. 2003 (11) TMI 524 - SC
  3. 1996 (8) TMI 521 - SCH
  4. 2023 (12) TMI 697 - HC
  5. 2023 (8) TMI 987 - HC
  6. 2023 (8) TMI 932 - HC
  7. 2023 (5) TMI 93 - HC
  8. 2023 (4) TMI 53 - HC
  9. 2022 (9) TMI 425 - HC
  10. 2022 (4) TMI 1250 - HC
  11. 2021 (2) TMI 844 - HC
  12. 2021 (2) TMI 94 - HC
  13. 2019 (9) TMI 529 - HC
  14. 2019 (6) TMI 893 - HC
  15. 2019 (6) TMI 946 - HC
  16. 2018 (9) TMI 300 - HC
  17. 2018 (8) TMI 995 - HC
  18. 2017 (11) TMI 864 - HC
  19. 2017 (5) TMI 864 - HC
  20. 2017 (1) TMI 1221 - HC
  21. 2017 (2) TMI 197 - HC
  22. 2017 (1) TMI 1225 - HC
  23. 2016 (9) TMI 1405 - HC
  24. 2016 (7) TMI 1298 - HC
  25. 2016 (5) TMI 221 - HC
  26. 2015 (10) TMI 719 - HC
  27. 2015 (6) TMI 541 - HC
  28. 2015 (3) TMI 735 - HC
  29. 2015 (9) TMI 929 - HC
  30. 2015 (3) TMI 194 - HC
  31. 2013 (11) TMI 448 - HC
  32. 2010 (12) TMI 1259 - HC
  33. 2010 (6) TMI 814 - HC
  34. 2008 (8) TMI 993 - HC
  35. 2007 (8) TMI 668 - HC
  36. 2005 (2) TMI 156 - HC
  37. 2004 (10) TMI 108 - HC
  38. 2003 (3) TMI 120 - HC
  39. 2002 (3) TMI 69 - HC
  40. 2002 (1) TMI 77 - HC
  41. 2001 (6) TMI 69 - HC
  42. 2001 (1) TMI 102 - HC
  43. 2000 (12) TMI 109 - HC
  44. 2000 (2) TMI 112 - HC
  45. 2024 (11) TMI 792 - AT
  46. 2024 (9) TMI 418 - AT
  47. 2024 (7) TMI 104 - AT
  48. 2024 (7) TMI 7 - AT
  49. 2024 (5) TMI 530 - AT
  50. 2024 (4) TMI 789 - AT
  51. 2024 (5) TMI 558 - AT
  52. 2024 (3) TMI 1230 - AT
  53. 2024 (1) TMI 675 - AT
  54. 2023 (12) TMI 371 - AT
  55. 2023 (12) TMI 41 - AT
  56. 2023 (7) TMI 1123 - AT
  57. 2023 (2) TMI 10 - AT
  58. 2022 (12) TMI 719 - AT
  59. 2022 (12) TMI 93 - AT
  60. 2022 (8) TMI 1099 - AT
  61. 2022 (8) TMI 102 - AT
  62. 2022 (6) TMI 776 - AT
  63. 2022 (5) TMI 562 - AT
  64. 2022 (3) TMI 751 - AT
  65. 2022 (2) TMI 1168 - AT
  66. 2022 (1) TMI 391 - AT
  67. 2021 (6) TMI 952 - AT
  68. 2020 (10) TMI 155 - AT
  69. 2020 (3) TMI 150 - AT
  70. 2020 (1) TMI 1095 - AT
  71. 2020 (1) TMI 1060 - AT
  72. 2019 (11) TMI 897 - AT
  73. 2020 (1) TMI 364 - AT
  74. 2019 (6) TMI 904 - AT
  75. 2019 (5) TMI 1779 - AT
  76. 2019 (5) TMI 1283 - AT
  77. 2018 (11) TMI 1143 - AT
  78. 2018 (7) TMI 854 - AT
  79. 2018 (5) TMI 1664 - AT
  80. 2018 (5) TMI 1677 - AT
  81. 2018 (4) TMI 612 - AT
  82. 2017 (12) TMI 1249 - AT
  83. 2017 (12) TMI 1038 - AT
  84. 2017 (8) TMI 161 - AT
  85. 2017 (4) TMI 1123 - AT
  86. 2016 (8) TMI 1111 - AT
  87. 2015 (11) TMI 343 - AT
  88. 2015 (10) TMI 1805 - AT
  89. 2015 (1) TMI 127 - AT
  90. 2014 (1) TMI 1564 - AT
  91. 2014 (3) TMI 353 - AT
  92. 2014 (3) TMI 12 - AT
  93. 2011 (11) TMI 153 - AT
  94. 2013 (9) TMI 378 - AT
  95. 2012 (8) TMI 815 - AT
  96. 2014 (3) TMI 699 - AT
  97. 2011 (6) TMI 513 - AT
  98. 2009 (7) TMI 1056 - AT
  99. 2008 (12) TMI 579 - AT
  100. 2008 (12) TMI 182 - AT
  101. 2005 (6) TMI 106 - AT
  102. 2004 (1) TMI 471 - AT
  103. 2003 (6) TMI 81 - AT
  104. 2003 (5) TMI 78 - AT
  105. 2002 (1) TMI 143 - AT
Issues involved: Show cause notice for denial of refund claim u/s 11B of Central Excise Rules and Act, 1944 for deposit made under Section 35F for appeal remedy.

Summary:
The High Court of Bombay heard a case where a show cause notice was issued by the Superintendent (Tech.) Central Excise to the petitioner, questioning the refund claim for Excise Duty and Redemption fine paid amounting to Rs. 14,07,410, deposited under Section 35F for appeal remedy. The Appellate Tribunal had allowed the petitioner's appeal with consequential relief, but the refund of the deposited amount was denied, leading to the issuance of the impugned show cause notice under Section 11B. The Court found the Department's claim in the notice to be dishonest and baseless, stating that Section 11B cannot be applicable to a deposit made under Section 35F, as it is not a payment of Duty but a pre-deposit for appeal rights, mandating refund upon appeal success.

Regarding the deposit under Section 35F, the Court held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply. Consequently, the petition was successful, and the impugned show cause notice was quashed. The respondents were directed to refund the deposited amount of Rs. 14,07,410 along with 15% interest per annum from the date of the Appellate Tribunal's order on 30th November 1993. The rule was made absolute in the stated terms, and the respondents were ordered to pay the petitioners the costs of the petition.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates