9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (8) TMI 242 - AT - Central Excise
Issues involved: Claim of exemption under Notification 108/95-C.E. for goods supplied to NTPC project financed by IBRD.
Summary: The appellant, an assessee under Central Excise Act, 1944, claimed exemption under Notification 108/95-C.E. for goods supplied to M/s. BHEL, who in turn were to supply to NTPC project guaranteed by IBRD. The claim was rejected due to lack of required certificate from Nodal Ministry in the Government of India. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection stating the claim was unsubstantiated. However, after considering the material on record, it was found that the appellant's supplies to the NTPC project were eligible for the exemption as per the notification requirements. The denial of benefit based on failure to prove actual supply to the project site was not upheld. The appellant had submitted relevant certificates and documents to support their claim, and the performance of the contract ensured eventual supply to the project site. Consequently, the order rejecting the claim was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The relevant portion of Notification 108/95-C.E. exempts goods supplied to projects financed by the United Nations or an International organisation and approved by the Government of India. The appellant's supplies to the NTPC project, as a sub-contractor to M/s. BHEL, were found to be eligible for the exemption. The denial based on failure to prove actual supply to the project site was not conclusive, as the contract performance ensured eventual delivery to the approved project site. The CCE (A) was found to be exceeding the scope of the notice issued, as the issues disputed were not in line with the allegations in the Show Cause Notice. The appellant had submitted relevant certificates and documents, including JBRD funding Certificate, NTPC's order on BHEL, Planning Commission Approval, and Public Notices from the Ministry of Finance, to support their claim for exemption under the notification requirements. The order rejecting the claim for exemption under Notification 108/95-C.E. was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on the appellant's compliance with the notification requirements and the approval of the project by the Government of India.
|
