9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (7) TMI 198 - AT - Central Excise
Issues involved: Clubbing of clearances of two units for duty demand, issuance of Show Cause Notice, consideration of cum duty benefit, exclusion of value of carbon from demands.
In the present case, the appeals arose from OIA Nos. 154 & 155/2001-C.E., dated 23-8-2001, where duty demand was imposed on the manufacturing of "Activated Bleaching Earth" and "Activated Carbon" for the period 1993-94 to 1997. The main contention was regarding the clubbing of clearances of two units without issuing a Show Cause Notice to the other unit involved. The appellants argued that the demands were barred by time and that cum duty benefit should have been considered, along with the exclusion of the value of carbon from the demands. Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal did not agree that the demands were barred by time. However, the plea for cum duty benefit and exclusion of carbon value from demands was not adequately considered despite evidence being produced by the appellants. The Department justified the duty demand on Activated Bleaching Earth based on a previous Tribunal ruling. The appellants' argument regarding the lack of Show Cause Notice to the other unit and the failure to establish how both units were one and the same was reiterated by the Department. The Tribunal observed that the Department had clubbed the clearances of the assessee with another unit without issuing a Show Cause Notice to the latter. The appellants had provided evidence of the separate nature of both units, including separate machinery and Sales Tax Registration. The Tribunal found that the clubbing of clearances without proper notice to the other unit was not justified, and the finding that the other unit was a dummy unit was not sustainable in law. Regarding the production of Activated Bleaching Earth, the Tribunal found that the Department's awareness of the production without evidence was not sufficient. The matter of duty confirmation on Activated Bleaching Earth was remanded to the original authority for re-consideration in light of relevant judgments, including the consideration of cum duty and exclusion of Activated Carbon value. The Tribunal directed the completion of the remand proceedings within four months. In conclusion, the appeal was allowed based on the above considerations.
|
