Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2024 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 473 - AAR - GST


Issues involved: Application for advance ruling u/s 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and OGST Act, 2017 regarding GST chargeability on rental/hiring services by a supplier who is the owner of the vehicle and Input Tax Credit eligibility for a Goods Transport Agency.

Ruling on GST Chargeability: The question of whether a supplier can charge GST on rental/hiring services under the Forward Charge Mechanism is deemed not maintainable as per Section 95(a) of the CGST Act, 2017 since no supply in this regard is undertaken or proposed by the Applicant.

Ruling on Input Tax Credit (ITC): The Applicant, being a registered person under GST, may be eligible to claim ITC on input tax charged on supplies used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to the conditions and restrictions specified in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017.

Key Details:
- The Applicant, a Goods Transport Agency, sought ruling on whether a supplier can charge GST on rental services and if ITC can be claimed based on supplier invoices.
- The Applicant provides transport services and opted to pay GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism.
- The Applicant planned to enter into a rental agreement with a vehicle owner for inclusive services like fuel, toll, driver salary, and maintenance.
- The Applicant argued that services provided by the vehicle owner to a GTA are exempt from GST as per Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
- The personal hearing was held, but the Revenue did not submit comments or attend.
- The ruling clarified the inapplicability of GST chargeability on rental services and outlined the conditions for claiming ITC under Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017.
- The ruling mentioned the appeal process available to the Applicant or jurisdictional officer if aggrieved by the decision.

Separate Judgement: No separate judgment was delivered by the judges.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates