Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (11) TMI 367 - AT - Income TaxDelay of 35 days in filing the appeal before CIT(A) - CIT(A) dismissed the Appeal filed by the Assessee on the grounds of delay in latches - HELD THAT - In our opinion, the Assessee has explained the sufficient reason for condoning the delay of 35 days in filing the Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). CIT(A) ought to have condoned the delay of 35 days in filing the Appeal and should have decided the Appeal on its merits. Thus, we condone the delay of 35 days in filing the Appeal before the CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the Appeal of the Assessee
Issues:
Delay in filing appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and condonation of the same. Detailed Analysis: The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The Assessee challenged the order on various grounds, including the delay in filing the appeal and the subsequent dismissal by the Ld. CIT(A). The Assessee contended that the delay was due to the initial advice of a senior counsel to file a writ before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, which was later withdrawn based on the advice of the High Court counsel. The Assessee also argued that the delay was reasonable and should have been condoned by the Ld. CIT(A). Upon hearing both parties and examining the record, the Tribunal found that the Assessee had provided sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal noted that the delay was not intentional but due to bona fide reasons related to the Writ Petition filed before the High Court. The Tribunal held that the Ld. CIT(A) should have condoned the delay and decided the appeal on its merits. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal partly for statistical purposes, condoned the delay of 35 days, and remanded the matter back to the Ld. CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity of being heard to the Assessee. In conclusion, the Tribunal acknowledged the reasons provided by the Assessee for the delay in filing the appeal and directed the Ld. CIT(A) to reconsider the appeal on its merits after condoning the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity to the Assessee and ensuring that the appeal is decided in accordance with the law.
|