Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2024 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (11) TMI 371 - HC - GST


Issues Involved:

1. Legality of the Show Cause Notice demanding GST on annuity payments.
2. Validity of Circular No.150/6/2021 GST in relation to GST exemptions.
3. Jurisdiction and appropriateness of challenging a show cause notice via writ petition.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of the Show Cause Notice:

The petitioner challenged the Show Cause Notice No.5/2023-24 dated 28.04.2023, which demanded GST on annuity payments received for the period September 2017 to September 2022. The petitioner argued that the annuity payments were exempt from GST under Sl. No.23A of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by subsequent notifications. The petitioner contended that the annuity payments were akin to toll charges, which were exempt from GST, and that the construction and maintenance services were completed before the GST Act, 2017 came into force. The respondent department, however, argued that the services rendered by the petitioner fell under Service Accounting Code (SAC) 9954, which pertains to construction services and is not exempt under the GST notifications. The court found that the determination of whether the services fall under the exempt category requires a fact-finding exercise, which cannot be conducted in a writ petition.

2. Validity of Circular No.150/6/2021 GST:

The petitioner sought to declare Circular No.150/6/2021 GST as ultra vires, arguing that it contradicted the exemption notifications and the 22nd GST Council's recommendations. The circular clarified that GST is not exempt on annuity payments for road construction services, which fall under SAC 9954. The court held that the circular did not contradict the GST Council's resolutions or the notifications, as it merely clarified that the exemption under Entry No.23A applies only to services under SAC 9967 and not to construction services under SAC 9954. The court disagreed with the Karnataka High Court's judgment, which had quashed a similar circular, and upheld the validity of the circular.

3. Jurisdiction and Appropriateness of Challenging a Show Cause Notice:

The court emphasized that ordinarily, a writ petition should not be entertained against a show cause notice, as it does not constitute an adverse order affecting rights unless it is issued without jurisdiction or is otherwise illegal. The court cited several Supreme Court judgments underscoring this principle. The petitioner failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional error or other exceptional circumstances warranting interference at this stage. The court noted that the petitioner could present its claims before the appropriate authority in response to the show cause notice, which might result in the notice being dropped. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to submit an explanation to the respondent authority within four weeks.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates