2025 (1) TMI 1160 - AT - Income Tax

Revision u/s 263 - assessee has not offered the interest income - Taxation of accumulated interest on debentures converted into equity shares - HELD THAT - It is very clear that the assessee has not offered the interest income to tax on the ground that she is following cash system of accounting and the same would be taxable in the year of sale of equity shares. This plea is bereft of any substance. It is very clear that the whole interest amount is deemed to be received by the assessee upon conversion of debentures into equity shares in this year. If the amount of Rs. 61.97 Lacs is not brought to tax the same would never be brought to tax. Pertinently the conversion of debentures into shares have happened for face value of debentures for Rs. 2000/- plus accumulated interest of Rs. 1500/- per debenture. The value of shares essentially has two components i.e. face value of debentures of Rs. 2000/- and other component is accumulated interest of Rs. 1500/- per debenture. The capital gains on sale of shares would naturally be computed in the year of sale by adopting cost of acquisition accordingly. Therefore the plea that if the interest component is taxed in this year the same would amount to double taxation is fallacious and hence not acceptable. The cost shall include both the components in terms of Sec. 49(2A). There is no quarrel on the issue that such conversion of debentures into equity shares would not be regarded as transfer as per Sec. 47(x) so far as the computation of capital gain is concerned. However here is question is of taxability of interest component of debenture that has accrued to the assessee up-to the date of conversion. Therefore we conclude that the action of Ld. AO in accepting the return of income was not in accordance with law. The order has errors which is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Under these circumstances the revision of the order could not be faulted with. Decided against assessee.

ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The Tribunal considered several core legal questions in this appeal:

1. Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to revise the assessment order.

2. Whether the assessment order dated 14 September 2021 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

3. Whether the accumulated interest on debentures converted into equity shares should be taxed as interest income in the year of conversion.

4. Whether the conversion of debentures into equity shares constitutes a transfer under the Act, affecting the taxability of the interest component.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

1. Jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 263 of the Act allows the Pr. CIT to revise an assessment order if it is deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The provision requires that the Pr. CIT demonstrate both elements for the invocation of revisionary jurisdiction.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the Pr. CIT exercised jurisdiction under section 263 on the grounds that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to properly examine the taxability of the interest component on debentures converted into equity shares.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal found that the Pr. CIT's assumption of jurisdiction was justified as the AO's acceptance of the assessee's return without adequate scrutiny of the interest component was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue.

Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee argued that the AO had considered all relevant submissions and that the issue was subject to multiple interpretations. However, the Tribunal held that the AO's lack of a holistic examination warranted the Pr. CIT's intervention.

2. Erroneous and Prejudicial Assessment Order

Key evidence and findings: The Tribunal observed that the AO did not bring the accumulated interest of Rs. 61.97 Lacs to tax, which was deemed to be received upon conversion of debentures into equity shares.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal concluded that the AO's failure to tax the interest component resulted in an erroneous order, prejudicial to the revenue's interest.

Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee contended that the interest should be taxed upon the sale of equity shares. However, the Tribunal rejected this, stating that the interest was deemed received at conversion, and not taxing it would result in it never being taxed.

3. Taxability of Accumulated Interest on Debentures

Relevant legal framework and precedents: The Tribunal referenced sections 56, 2(24)(iv), 49(2A), and 47(x) of the Act to address the taxability of interest income and capital gains.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal determined that the accumulated interest should be taxed as interest income in the year of conversion, as the conversion of debentures into equity shares included both the face value and the interest component.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal held that the interest component was part of the conversion value and should be taxed in the year of conversion, with the cost of acquisition for capital gains purposes including both components.

Treatment of competing arguments: The assessee's argument that taxing the interest component would result in double taxation was dismissed. The Tribunal clarified that the cost of acquisition for capital gains would include the interest component, preventing double taxation.

4. Conversion of Debentures as a Transfer

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 47(x) of the Act provides that conversion of debentures into equity shares is not considered a transfer for capital gains computation.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal acknowledged that the conversion is not a transfer under section 47(x) for capital gains purposes but emphasized that the issue at hand was the taxability of the interest component, not the capital gains.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal concluded that the conversion did not affect the taxability of the interest component, which was deemed received upon conversion.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Tribunal upheld the Pr. CIT's revision of the assessment order, affirming that the AO's failure to tax the interest component was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest component was deemed received upon conversion and should be taxed in the year of conversion. The appeal was dismissed, and the AO was directed to re-do the assessment with a speaking order after verifying the facts and providing the assessee an opportunity for a hearing.

← Previous Next →