Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2025 (2) TMI 874 - HC - Income TaxValidity of reopening of assessment proceedings - denial of principle of natural justice - despite the reply having being filed within the statutory period of seven (7) days AO proceeded to pass an order u/s 148A (d) without considering the reply so filed by the petitioner - HELD THAT - Revenue fairly states that the petitioner may be given one more opportunity to respond to the notice dated 21.08.2024. The impugned order passed u/s 148A (d) as well as the notice issued u/s 148 are set aside. AO shall consider the reply already filed by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within a period of four weeks.
The Delhi High Court, in a writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, addressed issues related to notices issued under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner challenged the timeline provided for response to the notice, alleging a violation of statutory provisions and principles of natural justice. Despite the petitioner submitting a reply within the statutory period, the Assessing Officer proceeded to pass an order without considering the response. The Court set aside the impugned order and notice, directing the Assessing Officer to consider the filed reply and obtain necessary approval if issuing a new notice under the Act. The writ petition and related applications were disposed of accordingly.
|