2025 (3) TMI 1067 - SCH - Money Laundering

Seeking grant of interim bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 due to the alleged medical conditions of his family members and the inability of his wife - it was held by High Court that there is no ground to enlarge the applicant on interim bail. HELD THAT - There are no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. However the High Court is requested to decide the pending bail application on its own merit without being influenced by the impugned order. SLP dismissed.

Summary

In the Supreme Court judgment, Justices M.M. Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal presided over the case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Senior Advocate, along with a team of advocates. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, the Court concluded that there were no grounds to interfere with the High Court's order. However, the Supreme Court requested the High Court to decide the pending bail application "on its own merit, without being influenced by the impugned order." Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.