9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (3) TMI 1450 - AT - Service TaxScope of service and declared service - whether the supply of food and beverages in the cinema complex falls within the definition of service and declared service in terms of Section 65B(44) and Section 66E of the Finance Act 1994? - HELD THAT - The issue is no longer res integra and has been decided in the case of the appellant themselves in the case of M/s. PVR Limited Shri Nitin Sood Shri Ajay Bijli and Shri Brijesh Arora Vs. CST New Delhi 2023 (12) TMI 81 - CESTAT NEW DELHI holding that the supply of food and beverages in the cinema hall does not involve any service element and is merely transaction of sale. The period involved in the said order was from 2013-2014 to 2015 and the present appeal involves the subsequent period from 2015-16 to June 2017. The facts and the issue being same the present appeal is squarely covered by the aforesaid decision of this Bench. Conclusion - The sale of food and beverages in cinema complexes when limited to pre-packaged or reheated items without additional service elements is not a service under the Finance Act. There is no reason to differ with the aforesaid order - Appeal allowed.
ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The primary issue considered in this appeal was whether the supply of food and beverages within a cinema complex constitutes a "service" or "declared service" under Sections 65B(44) and 66E of the Finance Act, 1994. This determination affects whether such transactions are subject to service tax. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents The legal framework centers on the definitions of "service" and "declared services" as outlined in Sections 65B(44) and 66E of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal referenced prior decisions, including a notable case involving the same appellant, which concluded that the sale of food and beverages in cinema halls does not constitute a service but rather a sale of goods. This precedent was pivotal in the Tribunal's analysis. Court's Interpretation and Reasoning The Tribunal interpreted the supply of food and beverages as a mere transaction of sale, devoid of any service element. It emphasized that the sale of pre-packaged or reheated food items to cinema-goers, who consume these items at their seats, does not involve any additional service. The Tribunal distinguished this from scenarios where services, such as table service in restaurants, are predominant. The Tribunal also highlighted the limited choice of food items and the fact that these items are accessible only to ticket holders, reinforcing the view that this is a sale transaction rather than a service. Key Evidence and Findings The Tribunal's findings were based on the operational model of cinema complexes, where food items are sold over the counter and consumed by patrons at their seats. The Tribunal noted the absence of elements typically associated with service, such as table setting, waitstaff, and personalized service, which are common in restaurant settings. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the short duration of movie intervals, which necessitates the availability of quick, ready-to-eat options within the cinema complex. Application of Law to Facts The Tribunal applied the established legal principles to the facts of the case, concluding that the transaction in question is akin to a sale of goods rather than a provision of service. The Tribunal drew parallels with previous judicial interpretations and circulars issued by the revenue authorities, which clarified that such transactions are not subject to service tax. Treatment of Competing Arguments The Tribunal addressed the Revenue's argument that the appellant had previously admitted service tax liability for similar activities. It distinguished between different categories of service within the cinema complex, specifically noting that the "Gold Class" category involves additional services that justify the imposition of service tax. However, for the standard transactions under consideration, the Tribunal found no basis for service tax liability. Conclusions The Tribunal concluded that the supply of food and beverages in cinema halls, under the circumstances described, does not constitute a service and is not subject to service tax. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, aligning with the precedent set in the appellant's previous case. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS The Tribunal reiterated key legal reasoning from its previous decision, emphasizing that transactions involving the sale of packaged or reheated food items in cinema halls do not involve a service element. The Tribunal upheld the principle that the dominant purpose of the cinema complex is to screen movies, and the provision of food items is merely incidental, not constituting a service under the Finance Act. Core Principles Established The Tribunal established that the sale of food and beverages in cinema complexes, when limited to pre-packaged or reheated items without additional service elements, is not a "service" under the Finance Act. This principle is consistent with the interpretation of similar transactions in other contexts, such as takeaway food sales. Final Determinations on Each Issue The Tribunal determined that the transactions in question do not attract service tax liability, setting aside the previous order and allowing the appeal. This determination was based on the consistent application of legal principles and precedents, as well as a thorough analysis of the facts and circumstances surrounding the supply of food and beverages in cinema complexes.
|
