Detailed guidelines for re-testing of samples - Customs - PUBLIC NOTICE No. 37/2017

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, KANDLA-370 210 F. No. S/20-07/AG/GST/17-18 Dated: 20/07/2017 PUBLIC NOTICE No. 37/2017 Sub: Detailed guidelines for re-testing of samples- reg. Attention of the Trade is invited to Board's Circular No. 30/2017- Customs dated 18th July 2017 issued vide F. No. 450/15/2017-Cus-lV. World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiated Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), which aims at simplifying the trade processes and bringing down barriers to trade has come into force w.e.f 22 February, 2017. India isa signatory to this agreement. 2) India has placed a number of trade related measures negotiated under the TFA in Category A. Article 5.3.1 envisages granting an opportunity for a second test in case the first test result of a sample taken upon arrival of goods declared for importation shows an adverse finding. Further Article 5.3.3 makes it obligatory to consider the result of the second test, if any, for the release and cleamnce of goods, and, if appropriate, may accept the results of such test. The aforementioned Articles have been placed in category A. In order to have uniformity in approach among the field foriniitions with regard to re-testing of samples, the following procedure is prescribed: a. Customs officers may draw the samples from import consignments for testing in case of consignments wherever needed. The results of all test reports, adverse or otherwise, shall be communicated to the importer or his authorized representative/ Customs Broker immediately on its receipt. b. In case the importer of his agent intends to request the Additional/ Joint Commissioner of Customs for a re-rest, then the same shall be made in writing to the said officer within a period of ten days from the receipt of the communication of the test results of the first test. Customs officers may take a reasoned view in case the importer or his authorized representative Customs Broker is unable to do so for reasons beyond his control. c. Where the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Customs grant an opportunity for a second test, he must clearly indicate in writing the name and address of the laboratory/ institution where the second test can be carried out. Such referral for re-testing may be made only alter being reasonably sure that the desired re- testing facilities exist at the I laboratory / institution. d. Re-test should be made only on the remnants of the samples originally tested or on duplicate representative sealed samples in the custody of the Customs. Further, to avoid delays, samples for second tests shall be marked as immediate before sending to the laboratory. In a case it may so happen that fresh samples have to be draw, then such sampling should be done in the presence of the importer or his representative/customs broker. e. The requests for re-test of samples on the ground that the original sample was not representative should be entertained only if the consignment is still in Customs control. At the time of drawing the samples, the importer or his representative shall be present and certify that the samples drawn are representative. f. The competent authority shall consider the results of the re-test without prejudice to the results of the first test. In case there is a variation in the results of the first test and the re-test, the competent authority shall take the decision relying upon either of the tests specifying the grounds in writing for the decision so taken. In case the competent authority is unable to decide whether to rely upon the first or the re- test results, then it may order a second re-test provided the consignment is still within the customs control. However, this option should not be resorted to in every case of variation between the first test and re-test results, g. The facility of re-testing is a trade facilitation measure, which should generally not be denied in the ordinary course. However, there might arise circumstances where the customs officer is constrained to deny the re-testing facility, Board expects that such denial would be occasional and on reasonable grounds to be recorded in writing. h. Where the re-testing procedure is done at the instance of the department instead of the importer, the above procedure shall be followed mutatis mutandis. 3. Difficulties faced, if any, may be brought to the notice of the undersigned. (P. V. R. Reddy), Principal Commissioner, Custom House, Kandla