taxation of short-term capital gains (STCG) : Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 111A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Clause 196 Tax on short-term capital gains in certain cases.

Income Tax Bill, 2025

Introduction

Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 111A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, both address the taxation of short-term capital gains (STCG) arising from specific securities transactions. These provisions are pivotal in the Indian tax regime, affecting a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including individual investors, Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), and corporate entities engaged in the buying and selling of equity shares, units of equity-oriented funds, and units of business trusts. The legal framework governing short-term capital gains taxation has evolved over the years, reflecting changes in market dynamics, policy objectives, and the government's approach to capital market development.

This commentary provides a comprehensive analysis of Clause 196, elucidating its objectives, key provisions, and practical implications. It further juxtaposes Clause 196 with the existing Section 111A, highlighting both continuity and divergence, and assesses the impact of recent legislative changes, particularly the rate enhancement effective from July 2024.

Objective and Purpose

The legislative intent behind both Clause 196 and Section 111A is to provide a special tax regime for short-term capital gains arising from transactions in listed equity shares, equity-oriented funds, and business trusts, where such transactions are subject to Securities Transaction Tax (STT). The rationale is twofold:

• To incentivize participation in the regulated securities market by offering a concessional tax rate, thereby fostering market liquidity and depth.
• To ensure tax compliance and discourage off-market transactions by linking concessional taxation to the payment of STT, which enhances transparency and traceability.

Historically, the concessional tax rate was introduced to align with the policy of encouraging investments in equity markets and to counter the potential deterrent effect of high capital gains taxation. Over time, the government has adjusted the applicable rates and scope in response to revenue considerations and market developments.

Detailed Analysis of Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

1. Scope of Application

Clause 196(1) applies to assessees whose total income includes capital gains from the transfer of a short-term capital asset, specifically:

• (a) Equity shares in a company;
• (b) Units of an equity-oriented fund; or
• (c) Units of a business trust;

provided that the sale transaction is chargeable to STT under Chapter VII of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004. The scope is thus limited to securities traded on recognized stock exchanges and subject to STT, excluding off-market or unregulated transactions.

Interpretation: The focus on STT ensures that only transactions routed through formal exchanges benefit from the concessional regime, reinforcing market integrity and reducing tax arbitrage opportunities.

2. Tax Rate and Computation

Clause 196(1)(i) prescribes a flat tax rate of 20% on such short-term capital gains, a change from the earlier 15% rate u/s 111A (prior to July 2024). The total tax payable is the sum of:

• Tax on the specified STCG at 20%;
• Tax on the balance of the total income, computed as if such balance were the total income.

Interpretation: The use of a flat rate, regardless of the taxpayer's marginal slab, simplifies computation but increases the tax burden compared to the previous regime. The aggregation ensures that other income is taxed per normal rates, maintaining progressivity for non-STCG income.

3. Relief for Individuals and HUFs

Clause 196(2) provides relief to resident individuals and HUFs whose total income (excluding the specified STCG) falls below the basic exemption limit. In such cases:

• The STCG eligible for concessional tax is reduced by the amount by which the other income falls short of the exemption limit;
• Only the balance STCG is taxed at 20%.

Interpretation: This provision ensures that the basic exemption limit is effectively utilized, preventing the anomalous situation where low-income taxpayers pay tax on STCG even when their overall income is below the threshold.

4. Exclusion for IFSC Transactions

Clause 196(3) excludes from its ambit transactions undertaken on recognized stock exchanges located in International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs), where consideration is paid in foreign currency.

Interpretation: This exception aligns with the government's policy of making IFSCs globally competitive by offering tax neutrality or incentives for transactions conducted in these jurisdictions.

5. Deduction under Chapter VIII 

Clause 196(4) stipulates that deductions under Chapter VIII (presumably analogous to Chapter VI-A under the Income Tax Act, 1961) are to be allowed from gross total income as reduced by the specified STCG.

Interpretation: This ensures that deductions (such as those for investments, insurance, etc.) are not set off against STCG eligible for concessional taxation, thereby preserving the integrity of the special regime.

6. Definition of Equity-Oriented Fund 

Clause 196(5) refers to the definition of "equity oriented fund" as assigned in section 198 of the Bill, ensuring consistency of terminology.

Practical Implications

1. For Taxpayers (Individuals, HUFs, Companies, and Others)

- Higher Tax Outgo: The move to a 20% rate for STCG (from 15%) increases the tax burden for all taxpayers earning such gains, effective for transfers on or after July 23, 2024.

- Continued Compliance Complexity: Taxpayers must continue to segregate STCG eligible for special rate from other capital gains, track STT compliance, and correctly compute deductions.

- Relief for Small Taxpayers: The adjustment mechanism for the basic exemption limit ensures that small taxpayers are not unduly penalized.

2. For Capital Markets

- Potential Impact on Trading Volumes: The higher rate may dampen enthusiasm for short-term trading, particularly among retail investors.

- Incentive for Holding Period Optimization: The differential between STCG and long-term capital gains (LTCG) rates may encourage longer holding periods.

- Alignment with Global Practices: The exclusion for IFSC transactions is designed to enhance India's competitiveness as a financial center.

3. For Tax Administration

- Simplicity in Enforcement: The flat rate and clear eligibility criteria facilitate straightforward assessment.

- Need for Vigilance: The STT linkage requires robust monitoring to prevent abuse (e.g., mischaracterization of transactions).

4. For Fund Managers and Business Trusts

- Clarity in Tax Treatment: The explicit inclusion of business trusts and reliance on the statutory definition of equity-oriented funds provide certainty.

- Potential Impact on Product Design: The higher tax rate may affect the attractiveness of certain fund structures.

Comparative Analysis: Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 111A of the Income Tax act, 1961

1. Tax Rate

• Section 111A: Originally provided a concessional rate of 10%, later increased to 15%. As per the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, the rate is 15% for transfers before 23 July 2024 and 20% thereafter.
• Clause 196: Directly prescribes a 20% rate, reflecting the updated legislative intent.

Analysis: The main substantive change is the increase in the applicable rate, leading to greater tax outgo for the same class of transactions. This may impact investor behavior and portfolio management strategies, particularly for high-frequency traders and short-term investors.

2. Scope and Applicability

• Both provisions apply to STCG from equity shares, units of equity-oriented funds, and units of business trusts, provided the transaction is chargeable to STT.
• Section 111A specifically refers to transactions entered into on or after the commencement date of Chapter VII of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004, while Clause 196 omits reference to the commencement date, presuming continuity.

Analysis: The scope remains largely unchanged, ensuring continuity in the types of transactions covered.

3. Relief for Low-Income Individuals and HUFs

• Section 111A: Contains a proviso allowing the basic exemption limit to be utilized by reducing STCG by the shortfall.
• Clause 196: Replicates this relief mechanism.

Analysis: No substantive change; the relief is crucial for equity and fairness in taxation.

4. Exclusion for IFSC Transactions

• Section 111A: Excludes transactions on recognized stock exchanges in IFSCs with foreign currency consideration.
• Clause 196: Retains this exclusion.

Analysis: The exclusion is consistent with the policy of promoting IFSCs as international investment destinations.

5. Deductions under Chapter VI-A / Chapter VIII

• Section 111A(2): Deductions under Chapter VI-A are to be allowed from gross total income as reduced by such STCG.
• Clause 196(4): Analogous provision with reference to Chapter VIII (the corresponding chapter in the new Bill).

Analysis: The principle that deductions cannot be claimed against STCG eligible for concessional rates is preserved, preventing tax base erosion.

6. Definition of Equity-Oriented Fund

• Section 111A: Refers to the definition in Section 112A or the relevant explanatory clause.
• Clause 196: Refers to Section 198 of the Bill.

Analysis: This ensures definitional clarity and consistency across the legislative framework.

7. Procedural and Structural Differences

• Section 111A is part of the Income-tax Act, 1961 with a long history of amendments, transitional provisions, and explanatory notes.
• Clause 196 is part of a new Bill, and may be accompanied by updated definitions, cross-references, and streamlined language.

Analysis: While the substantive content is similar, the new Bill may offer greater clarity and coherence, eliminating legacy ambiguities.

Key Differences Tabular Form

Aspect	Section 111A (pre-July 23, 2024)	Section 111A (post-July 23, 2024) / Clause 196
STCG Tax Rate	15%	20%
Reference to Deduction Chapter	Chapter VI-A	Chapter VIII (presumably analogous)
Definition Reference for "Equity Oriented Fund"	Explanation to section 112A	Section 198 of the 2025 Bill
Legislative Format & Language	Amendment-driven, legacy language	Modernized, consolidated in new Bill

Ambiguities and Potential Issues

• The increase in the STCG rate may prompt questions about the continued rationale for a "concessional" regime, especially if the rate approaches or exceeds the marginal slab rates for certain taxpayers.
• The definition of "equity-oriented fund" and "business trust" must be monitored for consistency, as any change in these definitions could have material tax implications.
• The treatment of off-market transactions or those not subject to STT remains outside the scope of these provisions, potentially leading to differential tax outcomes.
• The exclusion for IFSC transactions, while policy-driven, may create arbitrage opportunities unless carefully monitored.

Comparative Overview with International Jurisdictions

Globally, capital gains taxation varies widely. Many developed markets offer concessional rates for long-term capital gains, but short-term gains are often taxed at ordinary income rates. India's approach of a flat concessional rate (now increased to 20%) for specified STCG is distinctive, reflecting a balance between incentivizing market participation and safeguarding revenue.

The linkage to STT is unique to India, serving as both a compliance tool and a market development measure. The exclusion for IFSCs is part of a broader strategy to position India as a global financial services hub, a feature not commonly found in other jurisdictions.

Conclusion

Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, continues the broad contours of the special tax regime for short-term capital gains established by Section 111A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The primary change is the increase in the tax rate from 15% to 20%, reflecting a policy recalibration in response to fiscal and market considerations. The structure, relief mechanisms, and exclusions remain largely intact, ensuring continuity and predictability for taxpayers.

Stakeholders must adjust to the higher rate and ensure compliance with the procedural requirements, particularly regarding the segregation of eligible STCG and the correct computation of deductions. The exclusion for IFSC transactions and the precise definitions of covered securities remain areas requiring close attention.

As the new Bill moves towards enactment, further clarity through rules, notifications, or judicial interpretation may be necessary, particularly concerning transitional issues, definitional nuances, and the interaction with other provisions of the tax code.

---

Full Text:

Clause 196 Tax on short-term capital gains in certain cases.

 

 

Dated: 29-4-2025