Discussions Forum | |||||||||||||||||
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
|||||||||||||||||
Excise Sales Return in same month, Central Excise |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Excise Sales Return in same month |
|||||||||||||||||
Dear all, One of the sales invoice return by party along with original documents (Invoice date and returned in same month i.e May 2015). Kindly advise how to shown this transaction in ER1. Regards M.RamKumar Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records Page: 1
Duty paid goods if returned by the customer should be stored separately and entry of the same should be done in separate register. You can mentioned the same in Remark option in ER-1. You can avail cenvat credit on the base of original documents. for more detail you can refer Rule -16 as under 16. Credit of duty on goods brought to the factory. - (1) Where any goods on which duty had been paid at the time of removal thereof are brought to any factory for being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason, the assessee shall state the particulars of such receipt in his records and shall be entitled to take CENVAT credit of the duty paid as if such goods are received as inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and utilise this credit according to the said rules. (2) If the process to which the goods are subjected before being removed does not amount to manufacture, the manufacturer shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT credit taken under sub-rule (1) and in any other case the manufacturer shall pay duty on goods received under sub-rule (1) at the rate applicable on the date of removal and on the value determined under sub-section (2) of section 3 or section 4 or section 4A of the Act, as the case may be. Explanation: The amount paid under this sub-rule shall be allowed as CENVAT credit as if it was a duty paid by a manufacturer who removes the goods. (3) If there is any difficulty in following the provisions of sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2), the assessee may receive the goods for being re-made, refined, re-conditioned or for any other reason and may remove the goods subsequently subject to such conditions as may be specified by the 1[Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as the case may be]. Retrospective Amendment by Section 39 of Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2006 (29 of 2006) Amendment of rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decreed or order of any court, tribunal or other authority, any action taken or anything done or purported to have been taken or done, at any time during the period commencing on and from the 29th day of May, 2003 and ending with the 8th day of July, 2004 under the rule as amended by sub-section (1), shall be deemed to be and always to have been, for all the purpose, as validly and effectively taken or done as if the amendment made by sub-section (1) had been in force at all material times. Explanation. - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no act or omission on the part of any person shall be punishable as an offence, which would not have been so punishable if this section had not come into force. THE SCHEDULE (See section 39)
---------------- Notes:- 1. Substituted vide Not. 23/2014 - Dated 6-8-2014. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
|||||||||||||||||