Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Excise Duty Liability on Scrap generated at Job Worker Premises, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 108855
Dated: 6-7-2015
By:- Rakesh K Paliwal

Excise Duty Liability on Scrap generated at Job Worker Premises


  • Contents

Dear All,

Pl let me know the judgments on above subject, when Principle Manufacture sent goods[ under rule 4(5)a] for fuhrer processing to job worker /processor , and get back after processing , which is add in final product on which duty paid by principle manufacturer, what is the treatment of scrap generated at job worker premises regarding duty liabilty ????

Regards

Rakesh Paliwal

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 6-7-2015
By:- Arun Kumar Singh

The excise duty will paid on scrap also. Job worker should return the processed goods along with scrap to principal manufacturer.


2 Dated: 7-7-2015
By:- MUKUND THAKKAR

Dear Rakesh,

in such situation you have two option.

1) you may cleared the scrap from your end by paying excise duty on realization value.

2) As suggested by Mr.Arun you may returned to your principal manufacturer along with processed goods.


3 Dated: 7-7-2015
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

Dear Rakesh,

Waste and Scrap not required to be returned – Waste and Scrap generated at job worker’s end is not required to be returned to manufacturer. Only finished product is required to be returned- Forbes Aquatech v CCE (2008) 230 ELT 629 (CESTAT SMB)= 2008 (1) TMI 770 - CESTAT, BANGALORE – relying on CCE v Shahumbari Sugar (2004) 176 ELT 819 (CESTAT) = 2003 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI. In Windals Auto v CCE (2012) 279 ELT 298 (CESTAT SMB)= 2012 (11) TMI 479 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI, scrap was not brought back but was directly sold from place of job worker on payment of excise duty. It was held that there is no loss and demand is not sustainable.No penalty can be imposed if waste and scrap is not returned or permission not obtained for clearance as rules do not require obtaining any permission – Bata India v CCE (2009) 238 ELT 316 (CESTAT SMB).= 2009 (1) TMI 575 - CESTAT, KOLKATA

This is for your kind information.

Regards,

YAGAY and SUN

(Management, Business & Indirect Tax Consultants)


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates