Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Taxability on Ready Mix Concrate, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 109750
Dated: 20-1-2016
By:- Hiren Patel

Taxability on Ready Mix Concrate


  • Contents

In the case of M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. & Another, ECC Construction Group Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Hydrabad 2015 (10) TMI 612 - Supreme Court, SC has decided that RMC and CM are different product and thus RMC is not covered under notification no 4/1997 so it is liable for tax. So weather RMC made at site for the construction work of Bridge and road is taxable?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 20-1-2016
By:- CS RAHUL AGARWAL

Hi,

Going thru judgement, In simplex Infrastructure case wherein both tribunal as well as P&H HC have held RMC &CM to be same article and covered by the NN. 41/97, the SC have set aside both the order after pronouncing its final observation. The relevant para 21 is reproduced for ready reference:

In this backdrop, the only question is as to whether RMC manufactured and used at site would be covered by notification. Answer has to be in the negative inasmuch as Notification No. 4 dated March 01, 1997 exempts only 'Concrete Mix' and not 'Ready Made Mixed Concrete' and we have already held that RMC is not the same as CM.

So, the apex court have clearly rule out that RMC manufactured at same site and used in same site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97. The simplex case where contrary view was taken has been remanded back to adjudicating authority to be decided in the light of SC pronouncement in instant case. The relevant para 24 read as:

In the instant case, the CESTAT has held that as the RMC was manufactured at site and was used in construction work at site, the same was covered vide Notification No.41/97-CE. This view of the Tribunal has been upheld by the High Court thereby dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. Having regard to our discussion in the case of L&T, this view has to be rejected. we remit the case back to the adjudicating authority to look into the matter afresh from this angle, keeping in view our observations in this judgment.

Hope it is cleared now. RCM & CM are different goods and RMC at site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97 liable to duty even manufactured at site of its use.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates