Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Brand name with 150 lakhs, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 110004
Dated: 8-3-2016
By:- varun arora

Brand name with 150 lakhs


  • Contents

Dear Experts

If a manufacturer is working for others i.e doing job work but not labelling the brand on product.

Then is this clearances is not eligible to take benefit of ssi exemption means not using of brand name but working for others disqualifies to take benefit of 150 lakhs

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 12 of 12 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 8-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The value of job work is not to be included in threshold exemption limit of ₹ 150 lakhs.


2 Dated: 8-3-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

I endorse the views of Sh. Kasturi ji Sir.......


3 Dated: 8-3-2016
By:- Mahir S

Yes sir, Clearances which are exempt from the whole of the excise duty leviable thereon under specific job work notifications are not to be included for calculation of threshold limit of ₹ 150 lalkhs, as explained above.


4 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Varun Arora Ji,

In continuation of my reply dated 8.3.16, I further clarify that value of job work will be taken into account (included) for computation of aggregate value of clearances of Rs.Four Hundred lakhs in terms of Board's circular no. Circular No. 733/49/2003-CX., dated 6-8-2003 read with Notification No.8/2003-CE as amended.

The benefit of value of job work is only for computation of clearances of ₹ 1.50 crores as an SSI Unit and NOT for Rs. Four Hundred Lakhs.

 


5 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- CS SANJAY MALHOTRA

Respected Sh. Kasturi Sethi ji,

For sake of better clarification, Clearances which are Exempted from whole of Duty of Excise under SPECIFIC JOB WORK notifications are not to be included for determing Turnover of ₹ 400 Lacs.

Specific Job Work Notifications such as 214/86-CE dt. 25/03/86 or 83/94-CE dt. 11.04.94

May be I would have missed out some provision... Would look forward for knowledge update.

SSI has option for duty payment for the job worker activity done for manufacturer. Same does not fall under 214/86, hence your view point to that extent holds good.


6 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.CS Sanjay Malhotra Ji,

Sir, I have rechecked the language of Notification No.8/2003-CE. You are absolutely right. The value of job work under specific notifications is not to included for computing Rs.four hundred lakhs as per clause 3 A(e) of this notification. The querist is requested to follow the correct reply of Sh.CS Sanjay Malhotra, expert.


7 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.CS Sanjay Malhotra Ji,

In your reply dated 10.3.16, the last line, "SSI has option for duty payment for the job worker activity done for manufacturer. Same does not fall under 214/86, hence your view point to that extent holds good." has made the concept of eligibility of SSI unit clearer not only to me but also to all other visitors. Really enriched the knowledge.Thanks, Sir.'That extent' was brewing in my mind.


8 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- varun arora

Dear Experts

Thank you so much for prompt reply, But i want to clarify again if i am working for others and not labelling any brand name then in this case shall i need to pay excise duty without any exemption i.e. value based exemption.

Shall it mean that This is job work and i can not avail ssi exemption of 150 lakhs


9 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- Mahir S

Varun ji,

Without confusing you any more, Let me tell you in simple words that you can carry out job work of as much amount as u you want, and still you can avail the SSI exemption benefit..

Cheers...


10 Dated: 10-3-2016
By:- varun arora

Ok thank you sir.


11 Dated: 11-3-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Agreed with views dated 10.3.2016 of Sh.Mahir S, Sir.


12 Dated: 11-3-2016
By:- Mahir S

Thanks all...


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates