Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||||||||
Home Forum Service Tax This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||||||||
Trading Export is Considered as Exempted Services, Service Tax |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Trading Export is Considered as Exempted Services |
||||||||||||||||||
Dear Experts, We are manufacturer cum merchant exporter, we are doing manufacturing sale and trading sale in domestic market as well as export market. whether our trading export will be treated as exempted service and cenvat to be reverse under rule 6(3) of cenvat credit rule 2004. Please advice. Thanks Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 9 of 9 Records Page: 1
Rule 6 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is not applicable for trading goods exported.
Dear Sir, Please elaborate this with rules. Thanks
Exported goods are to be treated as duty-paid goods. It is a fact.
Dear Sir, Trading Goods mention in negative list of service whether it is export or domestic. Hence it should exempted service and rule 6(3) should be apply for manufacturer. Please advice. Thanks
Sir, the same query was raised by you in the issue id #1 Issue Id: - 110695 Thanks.
Sh.Ram Sharma Ji, Be well conversant with the meaning of 'Export' and benefits attached with the export. Also search on cbec site or on google. If you cannot, then I shall come with authority on the issue.
In this Case I endorse the view expressed by Shri Kasturi Ji. It is a well settled fact that taxes should not be exported. If a trading goods are exported, any reversal would mean cost of export go up which is not the intention of legislature as it would make the Indian product in-compatible in the international market. I fully agree with Shri Karturi ji, that trading export should not be treated as exempt service and no reversal under Rule 6 (3) is required. V.Venkat Raman
the Following case law maybe helpful. 2007 (12) TMI 209 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT REPRO INDIA LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA Export of exempted goods - common inputs in dutiable goods and exempted goods - non-maintenance of separate accounts as contemplated by Rule 6(2) – held that in such case where goods are exported, direction by revenue to the petitioner to pay 10% of sale price of exempted goods u/r 6(3)(b) is not justified - If the exempted products are exported outside India the provisions of Rule 6(6)(v) of CCR are applicable. Therefore, the bar provided u/r 6(1) and the liability created u/r 6(3)(b) are not attracted – therefore, credit is available on “inputs used in mfg. of goods exported” even if goods are exempted
Sh.V.Venkat Raman Ji, Thanks a lot, Sir, for echoing my views. I really appreciate your art of expression which always gives loud and clear message. What I miss, you do not appear on this forum regularly.
Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||||||||||||