Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Service Tax adjustment under rule 6(4A) of STR 1994, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 111171
Dated: 28-11-2016
By:- Yatin Bhopi

Service Tax adjustment under rule 6(4A) of STR 1994


  • Contents

Dear expert

We recently gone through CERA audit. Now they have submitted their report to our excise jurisdiction and pointed out that in 3 instances reflected in ST-3 return where we have adjusted excess service tax paid beyond the time permitted under Rule 6(4A) of STR 1994 i.e. assessee may adjust such excess amount against his service tax laibility for the succeeding month or quarter, as case may be.

Now we have received letter from department where they have asked us to pay Service tax excess paid in the month of May,14 , June 14 and July 14 and adjusted in Aug 14 and Sep 14 (after Two months). Further They have also asked us to pay interest and Penalty.

Please let me know the factual position of law in this regard. There are various case laws in assesses favor

2016 (6) TMI 239 - CESTAT CHENNAI M/s. Schwing Stetter (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, LTU, Chennai

Please share your views which will help me to give suitable replay

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 28-11-2016
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan

Sir,

You contest the demand made by the Department on the strength of case law cited by you. The case law cited by you has clearly held that non-adjustment of excess service tax paid in immediately following month is only a procedural lapse which will not result in short payment of duty.


2 Dated: 28-11-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

The judgment referred by you in your query is apt and nails the issue.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates