Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

CREDIT OF SAD IN RG 23 A PART - II C, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 111295
Dated: 1-1-2017
By:- SHARMA NARAYAN

CREDIT OF SAD IN RG 23 A PART - II C


  • Contents

Dear All

we received the material in varioys ch heading that is not capitalitem but we are capitalise the said material because of highvalue there is basic duty and SAD on invoice how can i take cenvat credit i am doing as per below detail

sir i am taking 50 % of basic Duty in current year and rest 50 % next year and Sad i am taking 100 % credit in current year is thic correct or not pls reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 7 of 7 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 1-1-2017
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Happy New Year 2017.

Primarily you need to check whethe items has been capitalized with taxes or not. If yes then there is no question for Cenvat credit. Thanks .


2 Dated: 2-1-2017
By:- SHARMA NARAYAN

excise duty not capitalise


3 Dated: 2-1-2017
By:- MUKUND THAKKAR

sir i am taking 50 % of basic Duty.

if you have received imported material than you can availed 50% of CVD amount + 100% of SAD amount.

if you have received capital goods Indigenously , In case Basic duty 50% and goods procuring from 1st or 2nd stage dealer and passing SAD. in case you can also Eligible to take 100% credit.


4 Dated: 2-1-2017
By:- SHARMA NARAYAN

thanks to all of you sir


5 Dated: 2-1-2017
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

I agree with the views of Sri Mukund Ji's view.


6 Dated: 2-1-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

Sh.Mukund Thakkar, an expert seldom appears but when he appears take it for granted that his answer to query is correct. 99.99 % he is correct.


7 Dated: 27-1-2017
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

According to Vikram Cement judgment, the definition of Capital Goods is very Stringent. If goods do not fall in this definition as amended from time to time then just capitalizing the same for accounting purpose would not do anything good. In the above query it is mentioned that goods procured by Mr. Narayan Sharma are not capital goods but they are capitalizing the same due to having high value.

In our view this will backfire in near future. Experts views are welcomed.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates