Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Other Topics This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

penalty under section 78, Other Topics

Issue Id: - 111935
Dated: 19-5-2017
By:- jagannath prasad

penalty under section 78


  • Contents

When scn under section 73 is for tax not-paid or short-paid, why do the adjudicating authorities not adjust the tax amount already paid while imposing penalty under section 78. E.g. In one case the assessee had deposited 18 lakhs under VCES. The department found that the total liability was 40 lakhs during the alleged period. In this case scn was issued for 40 lakhs and sought appropriation of 18 lakhs. The adj. authority confirmed 40 lakhs, appropriated 18 lakhs and imposed penalty of ₹ 40 lakh under section 78 when the fact is that only 22 lakhs was short declared.How far is adj authority correct in imposing 40 lakhs penalty.

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 19-5-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sir, You are absolutely right. It is gross injustice against the party.

What I think it is due to false declaration under VCES which is a very serious offence. Any defaulter was supposed to file true declaration under VCES. However, as per Section 111(3), procedure of Section 73 and 73 A is to followed. Regarding excess penalty only appeal is the remedy. Hope the assessee can get justice from the Appellate Authority.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates