inputcredit claim, Goods and Services Tax - GST

[suresh g]

Please clarify, whether it is mandatory that what ever input claimed based on invoice, it should appear in GSTR2A. In case input claimed not appearing in GSTR2A to be reversed ?

Posts / Replies

[praveenkumar mekalacheruvu]

In Point my view, there is no need to reverse the ITC which is claimed based on invoice and the same which is not reflecting in the GSTR-2A.Because at present the portal is not allowing the recipient to amend the details in the GSTR-2A.so if invoice is there,we can claim the itc irrespective of gstr-2A.

Let me know if there are mistakes in this reply

[KASTURI SETHI]

If any invoice is not reflected in GSTR 2A, it means your supplier has not uploaded the relevant invoice. Hence there shall be a mismatch. The department will not allow such ITC. So matching is an absolutely must. It is correct that Common Portal System is not functioning properly. So your supplier may not be at fault. So before issuance of SCN, you may get sufficient time to remove such mismatch. Meanwhile, you should pursue the matter with your suppliers for uploading all the invoices. If after uploading all the invoices by your supplier, you find any problem, you may lodge complaint with Grievance Redressal Cell.

[SHARAD ANADA]

Government has clarified by issuing press release dated 18.10.2018 that “facility to view FORM GSTR-2A by the recipient is in the nature of taxpayer facilitation and does not impact the ability of the taxpayer to avail ITC on self-assessment basis in consonance with the provisions of section 16 of the of CGST Act 2017”

I reproduced hereunder para 4 of said press release for your ready reference

It is clarified that the furnishing of outward details in FORM GSTR-1 by the corresponding supplier(s) and the facility to view the same in FORM GSTR-2A by the recipient is in the nature of taxpayer facilitation and does not impact the ability of the taxpayer to avail ITC on self-assessment basis in consonance with the provisions of section 16 of the Act. The apprehension that ITC can be availed only on the basis of reconciliation between FORM GSTR-2A and FORM GSTR-3B conducted before the due date for filing of return in FORM GSTR-3B for the month of September, 2018 is unfounded as the same exercise can be done thereafter also

[Hasmukh Patel]

The Company has availed input tax credit through GSTR-3B for the period 2017-18, without reconciling with GSTR-2A. The credit has been availed based upon the physical copies of the invoices.

The amount of GST credit claimed in GSTR 3B is in excess of the credit reflecting in GSTR 2A.
Can a company claim GST credit if it is not reflecting in GSTR 2A.

ANALYSIS:

The law is ambiguous with respect to above issues and hence it can be argued either ways as evident from the below arguments:-

Argument in favour of the position that credit cannot be claimed-

As per Section 16 2 (c) of CGST Act 2017, one of the condition to avail the input tax credit is, payment of tax should be made by vendor to Government.

“The tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the government, either in cash or through utilization of input tax credit admissible in respect of the said supply”

Therefore, on a reading of above provisions it can be concluded that payment of taxes by the vendor is a mandatory requirement before availment of credit by the vendor. Assuming that vendor has not paid tax (which cannot be conclusively confirmed though), it can be contended that the Company may not be in a position to claim credit.

Arguments in favour of the position that credit can be claimed-

GROUND 1- Practical difficulty to verify the credit availed by the recipient against the payment of tax made by the vendor.

One of the condition to avail the credit is that, the tax shall be paid by the vendor to the Government. Payment of tax is on the basis of GSTR-3B and not on the basis of GSTR-1. GST authority does not have a bifurcation of invoice wise details, against which vendor has made the payment through GSTR-3B. In the absence of such bifurcation, GST authority has to rely on the GSTR-2A, to compare the credit availment with the credit availed in GSTR-3B. Since the invoice is appearing in GSTR-2A of the Company, it can be argued that it can avail the credit. The only caution point is that this ground gets diluted if the vendor hasn’t filed 3B for that relevant tax period at all.

GROUND 2- Possession of Original Tax Invoice.

As per Section 16(2)(a), recipient should be in a possession of original Tax invoice or debit note issued by the registered supplier under this act. Hence, Claiming of ITC with the aforesaid condition cannot be denied.

GROUND 3- GST portal currently not in a position to do tax payment level matching
This issue would have been automatically addressed if GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 was functional. Since the GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 was not functional, the matching provision was not applicable and in the absence of such matching provision, one cannot identify, whether the payment of tax has been made by the vendor in respect of any particular invoice. Thus, for the time being, the only viable option is to rely upon uploaded data (whether submitted/ paid or not).

GROUND 4- Provisional availment of input tax credit.

As per Section 16 (2)(c) of CGST Act 2017, credit can be availed subject to payment of tax by vendor, the extract of same has been reproduced below:

“Subject to Section 41 and 43A of CSGT Act 2017, the tax charged in respect of such supply has been actually paid to the government, either in cash or through utilization of input tax credit admissible in respect of the said supply.”

However, Section 16(2)(c) is subject to Section 41. Section 41 of CGST Act, 2017 provides for provisional availment of credit, where it states as under:

“Every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed, be entitled to take the credit of eligible input tax, as self-assessed, in his return and such amount shall be credited on a provisional basis to his electronic credit ledger.

The law simultaneously allows for taking provisional credit under Section 41. And there is no timeline that has been prescribed as to till what point of time this credit can be carried forward in the books/ returns. The only timeline is the one mentioned in respect of Section 37(1), which talks about uploading of the invoices.

Thus, to conclude even if the vendor has not paid GST, the Company should be allowed to avail credit (even provisionally though) provided, the vendor has uploaded the invoice details which gets duly reflected in GSTR-2A report within the prescribed time limit.

CONCLUSION:

It can be argued that even though the substantive requirement of payment of tax by the supplier under Sec.16(2)(c) of CGST Act has not been satisfied (which does weaken the position of availing credit), the entire IT backbone/infrastructure as envisaged in Sec.37, 38, 42, 43 has failed to take-off, which made it impossible for the taxpayer to fulfil the procedure of taking credit. Thus, the credit should not be denied.