Discussions Forum | ||||||||||
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||
FIRST OCCUPATION OF PROJECT, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
FIRST OCCUPATION OF PROJECT |
||||||||||
Hello, Kindly guide on the following: As per clause 5(b) of Schedule II of GST which read as under: The following shall be treated as supply of services, namely :- (b) construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier.” Brief Facts: During the construction of the commercial project, in the state of haryana, for which Completion Certificate is not yet obtained, the builder let out two units for office purposes to his subsidiary companies. Query: In the context of rule 42 of the CGST Rules, Whether the activity of letting out of units in under construction project may be treated as first occupation of the project ? and the ITC should be reversed. Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 5 of 5 Records Page: 1
Sir, In my opinion first occupation on sale and letting out the units are not same. In the case of first occupation the unit is sold to the customer and the customer becomes the owner of the unit. In the case of letting out the lessee is permitted to use the unit as per his wish but ownership of the unit is still with lessor. Therefore the provisions of rule 42 of CGST Rules, 2017 is not applicable to the situation.
In my view, the word,'let out' is not covered under 'first occupation'. The word, "occupation" has not been defined in GST Act. What is the meaning of the phrase, "first occupation" is relevant here. The following decision of AAR, Karnataka will be useful for arriving at correct decision:
I endorse the views of Shri Rajagopalan
My reply is also in consonance with the reply of Sh.Ranganathan, Sir.
If first occupation via let out method fulfills the condition laid down in law then some builder may do so to save payment of tax which would be against the revenue. Wild thought. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||||