Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||
reversal of common input credit used for both taxable and non taxable supplies, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
reversal of common input credit used for both taxable and non taxable supplies |
||||||||||||
As per 42 of CGST 2017 common input credit used for both taxable and non taxable supplies should be reversed. I want know whether credit can be availed after deducting the items mentioned in Rule 42 or it must be reversed after taking credit in GSTR 3B and then only reversed. Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 6 of 6 Records Page: 1
Sir, first you have to show all in table 4(A) and then show reversal in table 4(B) of GSTR 3B.
Yes agree. However in case this kind of disclosure was missed you can make an intimation to dept else rectify the disclosure while filing GSTR-9 annual return
Dear Experts. What would be the practical implication if a registered person avails net ITC i.e. the eligible portion without following the procedure laid down in rule 42?
The department would understand by referring what is furnished in the return. Then you have to justify that this is the net input tax credit. In my view, it is only procedural method and do not amount to non-compliance.
Agree with Mr. Ganesh. Procedural aspects can be condoned and should not be leading to greater consequences.
Sh.Rao Rao Ji, I think you are talking about maintenance of separate account for taxable and non-taxable supplies for the purpose of ITC. In Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 as well as Rules 42 and 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, there is no provision for exercising option like maintenance of separate account or payment of an amount of six or seven per cent of the value of exempted supplies, as it existed under erstwhile Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Such option/provision in Central Excise era was omitted vide Notification No.13/2016-C.E. (N.T.) dated 1-3-2016 because practically it was not viable. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||||||