Discussions Forum | ||||||||
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||
Applicability of RCM to Labour Sub-Contractor, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Applicability of RCM to Labour Sub-Contractor |
||||||||
Dear Members, Our query is One of the Construction Company is doing construction of building in govt projects using service of Labour Sub contractor (Unregistered Dealer). We need to be clear whether we can go ahead using by paying GST under RCM for URD LabouSub Contractor. Any Notifications or Circulars in favour or against using RCM for Labour Sub contract under URD. Requesting Experts guidance and advise on this issue. Thanks and regards, Arunachalam M Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records Page: 1
No need to pay RCM u/s 9(3) as the service not covered Notification 13/2017 and even RCM u/s 9(4) is not application as the section suspended wef 13-10-2017
Agree. No liability under rcm
I agree with both experts. My further observations are as under :- (i) Sub-contractor is supplying manpower supply service (pure labour service) to Govt. projects for and on behalf of the main contractor (construction company) for construction service. (ii) Hence main contractor is, de facto, supplier of pure labour service to Govt. (iii) Manpower supply is not under RCM as per relevant notification as amended from time to time. (iv) Pure labour service is exempted vide Notification no.12/17-CT(R) dated 28.6.17 as amended from time to time up to 18.11.21. (serial nos.3 & 10 refer). (v) Govt. Authority and Govt. entity both have been excluded from the definition of Govt. for the purpose of exemption from GST w.e.f. 1.1.22 vide Notification no.16/21-CT(R) dated 18.11.21 effective from 1.1.22. (vi) In this scenario, the construction company (main contractor) is not a promoter as per definition of 'promoter' under Section 2(zk) of RERA, 2016 adapted vide Notification No.11/17-CT(R) dated 28.6.17 as amended (clause (xvii) of paragraph 4 .refers) inasmuch as pure labour service is involved. Hence no question of RCM on this ground also.
I agree with the view of the experts. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||