Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proper officer, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proper officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sir/Madam, On reading the Circular No. 171/03/2022-GST, Sr. No. 1 inter-alia specify that the registered person ‘A’ shall, however, be liable for penal action under section 122 (1)(ii) of the CGST Act for issuing tax invoices without actual supply of goods or services or both. Similarly, penalty under section 122 is also mention at Sr. 2 & 3. Now, the information of proper officer for difference actions and sections are laid down under Circular 1/1/2017-GST dated 26-Jun-2017, Circular 3/3/2017-GST dated 5-Jul-2017 and Circular No. 31/05/2018 dated 9’th February’2018. I want to know that who is the proper officer to invoke Section 122 with Section 73 or 74 and only 122 for issuance of SCN and adjudication. As the proper officer is not mentioned any where under above mentioned circulars. Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 8 of 8 Records Page: 1
The ‘proper officer’ has been empowered under GST law to execute and administer compliance of various Sections and Rules under GST law to protect the Government revenue and facilitates to the taxpayers to carry out day-to-day statutory compliance to run their business. The words ‘proper officer’ used in various parts of the GST law scattered through different provisions therein needs specific assignment to be performed under different sections of the statute to serve respective purpose of the relevant sections and rules made thereunder: Section 2(91) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines “proper officer” in relation to any function to be performed under this Act, means the Commissioner or the officer of the Central tax who is assigned that function by the Commissioner in the Board. C.B. & C, Vide its Circular 1/1/2017-GST dated 26-Jun-2017 [2017(2) G.S.T.L.45] has assigned powers of ‘Proper Officer’ for Registration and Composition levy under the CGST Act, 2017 or the Rules made thereunder to specified officers. The Board, hereby assigns the officers mentioned in Column (2) of the Table below, the functions as the proper officers in relation to the various sections of the said Act or the rules made thereunder mentioned in the corresponding entry in Column (3) of the said Table
Further, C.B.I. & C, vide its Circular 3/3/2017-GST dated 5-Jul-2017 [2017(2) G.S.T.L. 314], has assigned the proper officer relating to provisions other than Registration and Composition under CGST Act. The Board , hereby assigns the officers mentioned in Column (2) of the Table below, the functions as the proper officers in relation to the various sections of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 or the rules made thereunder given in the corresponding entry in Column (3) of the said Table:- Further, all officers up to the rank of Additional / Joint Commissioner of Central Tax are assigned as the proper officer for issuance of show cause notices and orders under sub-sections (1), (2), (3), (5), (6), (7), (9) and (10) of Section 73 and 74 of the CGST Act. Further, they are so assigned under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as well, as per Section 3 read with Section 20 of the said Act. Thus, the proper has been assigned different roles under GST Law to facilitate and extend cooperation to the taxpayers for their day-to-day statutory compliance. The proper officer sometimes perform as an administrative, adjudicating and quasi-judiciary authority to protect the Government revenue. In the recent judgement the Hon’ble High Court of Telangana in the Case of P.V.Ramana Reddy v. UOI- reported in 2019 (4) TMI 1320 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, held that “ the arrested person should be produced by the authorized officer before the Magistrate within 24 hours who may either remand him to judicial custody or release him on bail. The question of giving such person to police custody or custody to proper officer does not arise. The contention that the proper officer not being a police officer could not seek custody of arrested person, was held to be not tenable.” This view was approved by the Apex Court reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1528 - SUPREME COURT
Dear Sir It is the adjudicating authority who is authorized to invoke powers under Section 122 read with Section 73/74 as the case may be. Further refer the following provisions: Section 74 (11) Where any person served with an order issued under sub-section (9) pays the tax along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to fifty per cent. of such tax within thirty days of communication of the order, all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be concluded. Explanation 1.- For the purposes of section 73 and this section,- (i) the expression “all proceedings in respect of the said notice” shall not include proceedings under section 132; (ii) where the notice under the same proceedings is issued to the main person liable to pay tax and some other persons, and such proceedings against the main person have been concluded under section 73 or section 74, the proceedings against all the persons liable to pay penalty under sections 122 and 125 are deemed to be concluded. It means, once the notice or adjudication proceedings are issued against the main person fastening liability of tax, interest and penalty under Section 73/74, penal proceedings in respect of all other persons in the chain of similar transactions are deemed to be automatically concluded under Section 122 and 125. Such other persons enjoy the embedded immunity from penalty under Section 122/125.
I concur with the views of both experts.
Sir , If a person takes goods less invoices and further he also issues goods less invoices, then section 122(1)(Vii) & (ii) respectively are invokable. In this scenario section 73,& 74 are not invokable. I want to know who will be the proper officer to issue SCN or adjudicate when only section 122 is invokable in absence of Section 73 &74 ? As proper officer for Section 122 is not provided anywhere.
Dear Rajesh Ji, Consider this proposition. Section 79 has to be invoked for recovery of sale.
Sir, In a situation where a taxpayer received goods less invoices and further issued goods less invoices. There being no supply, section 73, 74 are not invokable. Only penalty under section 122(1)(ii) for supply and 122(1)(vii) to receive such goods less invoices are invokable. But there is no proper officer to invoke or issue SCN under these sections as per my knowledge. Further the above said matter doesn’t fall to invoke section 79. I want to know how SCN be issued for Section 122 only.
Rajesh sir, I am of the view officer can issue SCN under section 79 directly without resorting to section 73 or section 74.
please read "same" instead of "sale" in post 5 above. sorry for inconvenience. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||