9911796707
| Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home  Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Outward liability shown in GSTR9 and settlement of tax, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Outward liability shown in GSTR9 and settlement of tax |
||||||||||||||||||||||
One of my client has inadvertently missed to show complete sell /outward tax liability in GSTR-1 and paid tax according to the outward supply shown in GSTR-1. Hence no question of short payment arises. But later on he has shown excess outward supply in the GSTR-9 for the same period and paid applicable tax through DRC-03 but not paid the interest as he argued that he filed annual return and excess liability has been shown in annual return and tax paid accordingly. The matter pertains to 2017 18 and he filed annual return on 5.12.2020 while made payment on 20.12.2020. Whether liability shown in annual return instead of GSTR-1 is currect and whether he is liable to pay interest,as department sought. Please guide. Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 11 of 11 Records Page: 1
Interest at rate of 18% payable for delay payment of Tax.
There is no escape route for saving interest. Interest is payable from the due date to the date of setting off liability. Rectifying the figures in Annual Return is allowed but mistake committed in GSTR-1 is an offence. This offence still exists even after showing correct figures in Annual Return. This offence is not covered up. Penalty imposable on account of procedural lapse/technical lapse.
But the client say he has paid the tax liability through ITC only not by cash, so no question of interest arise.
But the client say he has paid the tax liability through ITC.
Were proceedings initiated against your client under Section 73 or 74 of CGST Act ?
Only ASMT10 has been issued
What is the date of Form GST ASMT-10 ? Whether any letter was issued prior to the issuance of Form GST ASMT-10 ?
In simple terms, if Section 73 or 74 is involved, interest has to be paid. No benefit of the clause ''interest has to be paid only on cash payment of tax.' is available in that situation. Pl. read carefully the following relevant extract of Section 50(1) of CGST Act and Rule 88 B of CGST Rules :- "[Provided that the interest on tax payable in respect of supplies made during a tax period and declared in the return for the said period furnished after the due date in accordance with the provisions of section 39, except where such return is furnished after commencement of any proceedings under section 73 or section 74 in respect of the said period, shall be payable on that portion of the tax which is paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger.]" "(1) In case, where the supplies made during a tax period are declared by the registered person in the return for the said period and the said return is furnished after the due date in accordance with provisions of section 39, except where such return is furnished after commencement of any proceedings under section 73 or section 74 in respect of the said period, the interest on tax payable in respect of such supplies shall be calculated on the portion of tax which is paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger, for the period of delay in filing the said return beyond the due date, at such rate as may be notified under sub-section (1) of section 50." The term 'Any proceeding' will encompass within its fold the investigation proceedings.
No. ASMT 10 has been issued, the payment has been made voluntary and during verification of DRC 03 of the said payment it came to the knowledge of department. Whether interest is applicable while he paid all his liability through DRC 03 by debiting ITC ledger.
He is liable to pay interest. Consider the following:- 1. What is the time of supply? it must be in 17-18.
The proviso to section 50(1) is not at all applicable here. The proviso reads as under: Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
