Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

regardin section 16(2)(c), Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 118929
Dated: 8-1-2024
By:- FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

regardin section 16(2)(c)


  • Contents

one of my client received intimation u/s 61 for the period 2019-20 requiring to deposit tax of Rs-104976/- due to non filing of GSTR 3B by the supplier. it has also been mention in the intimation that the assesse has done voilation of section 16(2)(c). however ITC is reflected in GSTR-2A but the supplier has not filied its GSTR-3B till the date of issue of ASMT-10. kindly advise what to do.

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 9-1-2024
By:- KASTURI SETHI

See the latest judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner of State Vs. Suncraft Energy Private Limited & Others - 2023 (12) TMI 739 - SC ORDER. Published in the last week of December, 2023. Take the shelter of this judgement. I hope this will solve your problem.


2 Dated: 9-1-2024
By:- Sadanand Bulbule

Dear Sh. Sethi Sir

The GST officers are narrowly interpreting the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgement rendered in the case of Suncraft Energy Pvt Ltd - 2023 (12) TMI 739 - SC ORDER saying that since the amount involved is on the lower side, the SLP is dismissed and not on merits.

But in reality, the officers are missing the opening remarks "Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case(s)". With this restricted and wishful interpretation, the officers are under verbal instructions from the higher-ups not to give effect to this judgement. They are unwilling to read the reasons to dismiss the SLP conjointly in the right spirit of justice.

So I understand that, there is an urgent need of the CBIC to clear the artificial clouds seeded by the departmental officers and help reach the results of the said judgement to the deserving taxpayers.


3 Dated: 10-1-2024
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Sadanand Bulbule Ji,

Sir, If it is so, it is a pitiable condition but at the same time we should not give up our spirited fight against injustice. One Adjudicating Authority is not FINAL.


4 Dated: 21-1-2024
By:- Shilpi Jain

There are a lot of cases on the aspect of GSTR 2A v 3B and payment of tax by the supplier. Some favourable and others unfavourable, depending on the facts of each case.

If it is a considerable amount involved then keep the matter alive by filing reply or appeal, so that any favourable decision will help you overcome the demand.


Page: 1

Post Reply

Quick Updates:Latest Updates