Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||||
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||||
Refund of sum deposited due to ITC discrepancy, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Refund of sum deposited due to ITC discrepancy |
||||||||||||||
Due to an ITC mismatch, one of my clients had to deposit tax via DRC-03 in August 2022 for the tax year 2018–2019. Following this, some suppliers who had not yet filed their GSTR-1 filed, and some suppliers issued certificates in accordance with Circular 183/15/2022 which was issued in Dec. 2022. During the case hearing, the assessing officer accepted the reply and and after giving credit of certificate and GSTR-2A passed a speaking order, stating that the refund requested in the notice's reply would be considered under the GST relevant section in a separate application. In December 2023, the order was passed. In the refund application, the assessing officer sent a notice stating that the applicant had voluntarily deposited tax and tax under section 73(5) via DRC-03, so it was not covered by excess tax payment and went against the legal system as defined by section 54 of the GST. Please advise me Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 7 of 7 Records Page: 1
If its deficiency memo, try applying again but this time under "on account of assessment/ prov assessment/appeal.." category while filing RFD-01 online. Also enclose a copy of the assessment order which states the refund application to be filed separately. I have faced similar situations, when the original assessment order was passed by State Department and the refund was before the Central Department.
Pls check the decision of Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Five Star Metals (P) Ltd. vs State Tax Officer & Ors. in WPC 20129 of 2020 dtd. 11-08-2023 wherein the Court has directed refund along with interest on ITC wrongly reversed by them. This squarely covers your issue.
Thank u very much
Officers always find innovative ways to deny eligible benefits to the taxpayers. File an appeal
Dear Sir, Payment of tax u/s 73(5) cannot be treated as voluntary payment in every situation. Payment of tax u/s 73(5) may be made on the ascertainment by the proper officer. As per Sec. 17(5)(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 74, 129 and 130 only ITC is not eligible to avail. There is no restriction to reject the ITC on account of voluntary payment of tax.
If the facts disclosed in the query are correct and complete, the Adjudication Order passed is not legally correct. Excess payment of tax can be by so many reasons. Suppose the excess payment was made voluntarily, even then it is not out of the term, "excess payment'. A serious legal infirmity indeed. Once the order is passed, filing an appeal is the only remedy. No chance for rectification in this scenario. Page: 1 |
||||||||||||||