Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Customs - Exim - SEZ This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

REVERSAL OF ITC ON RE-IMPORT OF GOODS EXPORTED UNDER LUT, Customs - Exim - SEZ

Issue Id: - 119438
Dated: 3-12-2024
By:- raghunandhaanan rvi

REVERSAL OF ITC ON RE-IMPORT OF GOODS EXPORTED UNDER LUT


  • Contents

Dear Experts,

Our client exported goods from a manufacturing unit referred to as "A," located in Madhya Pradesh, under a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) without paying Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST).

Due to quality issues, the buyer rejected the goods and re-imported them to India. However, the re-import was directed to another manufacturing unit of "A" located in Tamil Nadu. The Bill of Entry was filed using the Tamil Nadu address as the consignee, even though the Importer Exporter Code (IEC) is the same for both units.

The goods were cleared under Customs Notification No. 45/2017-Customs, and IGST was paid while reversing all export benefits received. They were delivered to the Tamil Nadu unit.

The questions are as follows:

1. Do goods exported under LUT from a Madhya Pradesh factory require reversal of input tax credit (ITC)? If yes, what is the procedure, and what relevant section, circular, or notification applies?

2. Is it correct that the goods were re-imported to the Tamil Nadu unit instead of the original Madhya Pradesh unit? The Tamil Nadu unit has paid IGST on the re-imported goods as per Notification 45/2017—Customs.

3. Which manufacturing unit can claim ITC on the IGST paid on the re-import if the Bill of Entry lists the Tamil Nadu unit as the consignee but other documents show the address of the Madhya Pradesh unit?

4. How does the Madhya Pradesh unit account for the re-imported goods because the Madhya Pradesh unit avails itself of export benefits, while the Tamil Nadu unit reverses the same?

Please clarify

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 4-12-2024
By:- Shilpi Jain

While re-importing, there was no need of paying IGST as per clause 5 in the table in the referred notification.

Also have a look at Circular No. 21/2019-Customs dated 24th July, 2019.

Consider applying for refund of IGST paid on re-import.


2 Dated: 4-12-2024
By:- raghunandhaanan rvi

Ms. Shilpi Madam,

Thank you for your prompt response. The circular you mentioned addresses the re-importation of goods that were exported for exhibition or consignment and are not considered for supply. Serial No. 1(d) of Notn 45/2017-Customs states that payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) is mandatory for re-imported goods.

We have the following queries:

1. Goods were re-imported to a manufacturing unit in Tamil Nadu, even though they were originally exported from Madhya Pradesh.

2. IGST and other incentives were refunded, as per notification 45/2015 Sl.No. 1(d) and a bill of entry was filed with the consignee at the Tamil Nadu address.

In this scenario, how should the Madhya Pradesh unit account for the re-import and the reversal of IGST?

 

         I look forward to your guidance.


Page: 1

Post Reply

Quick Updates:Latest Updates