Discussions Forum | ||||||
Home ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||
GST on sale of land in exchange of apartments, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||
|
||||||
GST on sale of land in exchange of apartments |
||||||
Hi, In a JDA, a landowner transfers the development rights to developer in exchange of newly constructed apartments. GST law provides for taxability in such cases. However, the other day I heard of an agreement wherein the landowner has sold the land through a sale deed in exchange of apartments/shops. In this, since one leg involves direct land transfer, it would not be liable to GST as per Schedule III. My question is: Since direct land transfers are exempt under GST, why do people prefer Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) over outright land sales, even though development rights in a JDA attract GST? Additionally, the second leg of the transaction remains the same in both cases. Could this preference be due to implications under other laws? If yes, then what would they be? Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records Page: 1
Dear Once there is an outright sale of land to the developer, the question of "Transfer of Development Right" attracting GST liability does not arise.However JDA might be for various other factors. Every JDA need not attract tax liability.
Without receiving any consideration, the landowner would be at the mercy of the developer if he would execute a sale deed for a consideration to be received in the future. That's why they execute a JDA.
Also depends on whether the land owner's rights are leasehold or freehold. Situation was different pre 1.4.2019 when 6 notifications in related matters attempted to define a clearer path. In both service tax and GST regimes, handling of society redevelopment transactions has been has been open to doubts. Supreme Court's validation of the Vasantha Green Projects case is expected to clear the matter on service tax at least. Extension to GST may come in future, till when such notices and orders are expected to continue to litigate. Page: 1 |
||||||