Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Income Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Case law - imposing penelty u\s 271(1)C, Income Tax

Issue Id: - 1707
Dated: 13-1-2010
By:- GYAN JAIN

Case law - imposing penelty u\s 271(1)C


  • Contents

The AO treat 25% of unverifible purchases as Income and trading addiion was made . Whether the AO can imposed penelty u\s 271(1)C or not . if not provide suitable case laws if any available

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 15-1-2010
By:- Surender Gupta
When the addition is being made only of technical ground, AO should not impose any penalty. In case he imposes the penalty,you would get the relief at appropriate level. But, if the transaction is found to be bogus one, certainly this case is of a penalty. Therefore, the facts and nature of the unverifiable purchase would be a major factor for determining the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c).

2 Dated: 16-1-2010
By:- DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Whether it is case of 'unverifiable purchase' or 'unverifible suppliers'. If purchase is verified by book entries in stock record as goods in, consumption and/ or sale of those goods as goods out or as clsong stock in quantity, then addition as well as penalty cannot be made. If it is a simple case of supplier parties not available, the A.O. must trace them and tax them and not assess, harrass and panalize the buyer

Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates