Discussions Forum | ||
Home Forum Income Tax This
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||
Long term/short Term Capital Gain, Income Tax |
||
|
||
Long term/short Term Capital Gain |
||
Sir, Do needful in regard following query. I will use it as guide line/Opinion.
As decided by the Bombay High Court : Commr. Of IT Vs. Citi Bank N.A. dt. 23-04-2003 261 ITR 570 , 134 Taxmann 467 3. Can I substitute Value as on 01-04-1981 for Land for consideration of Long Term Capital Gain and Value as on 01-04-1988 for Building for consideration of Short Term Capital Gain. Being Sec. 50 has given effect w.e.f. 01-04-1988 4. What is impact on Sec. 50 of the case law : Commonwealth Trust Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax (1997 (7) TMI 14 - SUPREME Court)=(1997) 228 ITR 1 (SC)
5. Any other view or Case Law for above fact. Thanks Sitaram Agrawal Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 1 of 1 Records Page: 1
Computation of Capital Gain - sale of land and building - Held that:- Land and building has to be bifurcated for the purpose of computation of capital gain and since depreciation in some years has been allowed in respect of building portion, the capital gain in respect of building portion has to be computed as short term capital gain under section 50. The gain in respect of land portion has to be computed as long term capital gain as per method prescribed in the Act. Since assessee has invested the long term capital gain in NABARD Bonds, assessee would be entitled to deduction under section 54 EC even in respect of short term capital gain computed under section 50 in respect of building portion, if the same was held for more than three years - issue is thus restored to the file of AO. See this: 2012 (12) TMI 682 - ITAT, MUMBAI Cadbury India Limited Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income tax, Range-5(1) Mumbai. The following case referred in your query is not relevant: 2003 (4) TMI 92 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Citibank N. A. Page: 1 Old Query - New Comments are closed. |
||