Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Other Income., Central Excise

Issue Id: - 5450
Dated: 20-3-2013
By:- Pradeep Dongre

Other Income.


  • Contents

Sir, 

During checking of balance sheet  it came to notice that the unit has received Rs. 2 Crores as income   for non lifting of material by their customer.On questioning the concerned person explained that  they had received  order for supply of goods but due to non lifting by them they  were charged Rs. 2 Crores which they have paid as per terms of contract.

Kindly let me know whether this income is to be treated as income from manufacture and Ex.Duty is payable  or  it should be treated as  commission income and  chargeable to service  tax /or under which head of service tax it should fall in case it is income chargeable to service tax.VERY URGENT.

P.M.Dongre

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 20-3-2013
By:- CA. Surender Gupta

Though after inception of negative list in the Service Tax Law and wide scope and definition of the term 'Service' it is felt that all such kind of receipt would be liable to service tax, but to my understanding, such compensation for non lifting of material is nothing to do with service for the purpose of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1944.

On the other side, in excise, if there is no removal, there is no scope of duty of excise.

In other words, the receipt is neither chargeable to excise  nor service tax.


2 Dated: 21-3-2013
By:- Pradeep Khatri

On such income which is of non operating nature, service tax is applicable w.e.f. 01-07-2012.  Earlier any income generated against Liquidity Damage was not subject to indirect taxation.


3 Dated: 21-3-2013
By:- CA. Surender Gupta

With due regard, I differ with the view of Mr. Pradeep Khatri.


4 Dated: 21-3-2013
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Kindly refer para 6.7 of the Service Tax Educational Guide, which states as below:-

Agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an

act or a situation, or to do an act

In terms of this entry the following activities if carried out by a person for another for

consideration would be treated as provision of service.

Agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act.

Agreeing to the obligation to tolerate an act or a situation.

Agreeing to the obligation to do an act.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates