Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Reverse of duty, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 789
Dated: 15-5-2008
By:- KAYALVIZHI VENKATESH

Reverse of duty


  • Contents

My client has made supplies of steel coils slit to size to 100% EOU against CT3 certificate. Since slitting of steel is a process and not manufacturing process, department informed the assessee that CT3 should not have been issued by the department for this supply and hence the duty is payable by the 100% EOU. However the EOU claim that they are exempt from all duties and they will not pay. Now the department has asked the assessee to reverse the duty along with interest. Is the department right?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 19-5-2008
By:- Madhukar N Hiregange
This case is a little difficult as the goods which are traded are not allowed to be supplied to the EOU only manufactured goods can be sent without processing. EOU may not pay at this point of time though they can avail the credit and take a refund of the central excise duty as well as the service tax paid. But refunds in India are a long drawn out process. There is possibility that there is a defense however it may entail litigation. You should contact a good consultant near you for assistance in this reagrd.

2 Dated: 25-9-2009
By:- R.S. Mangal
when slitting of steel is a process and not manufacturing process, the question of demanding excise duty is not tenable.

Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates