Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

TMI - e-Newsletter TaxTMI Misrepresented goods description & value, tax... TaxTMI Imported goods IGST levy for 2019-20 challenged; HC... TaxTMI Dismissal of Review Petitions: Court Upholds... TaxTMI GST refund claim restored despite procedural lapse... TaxTMI Upholding Tax Authority's Show Cause Notice, Court... TaxTMI Tax disputes resolution scheme - pending appeals... TaxTMI Govt bans manufacturing & operations involving... TaxTMI Penalty not automatic for audit report delay;... TaxTMI Industrial units in Sikkim seek clarity on... TaxTMI Tax notice upheld; State Tax officers empowered... TaxTMI Stricter disclosure norms for earnings calls and... TaxTMI Revised tariff values for imported edible oils,... TaxTMI Plaintiffs' request for securing amount rejected;... TaxTMI Petition allowed against non-speaking order... TaxTMI Tax authority's summary notice & attachment... TaxTMI Latest Case-Laws TaxTMI Latest Notifications + Circulars TaxTMI GST Council Decisions TaxTMI

Home

Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST Month 12 2024 2024 (12) This

Top-Tier, Free Access.
Share, Discuss, Innovate: Submit Reply / Post
No Spam, No Marketing: Avoid Deactivation

Forgot password New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

RICE- BRAND NAME NOT REGISTERED IN ANY ACTIONABLE CLAIM - Goods and Services Tax - GST

Extract

Tax payer selling a rice in brand name not registered no actionable claimed, affidavit filed only 2019 sep that to filed in GST range office only acknowledment copy recieved and got sign in delivery note now order passed against tax payer that filed affidavit is not valid and exemption is not allowed to brand name (not registered ) rice, tax calculated from from july 2017 to 2024 any case laws related to my issue ... ( Sarvasiddhi Agrotech Pvt. Ltd ) Shyam Agro Foods v. GST Commissioner (2021) this case are favour to tax payer

← Previous Next →