1977 (10) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the asst. yr. 1973-74 and 31st July, 1974 for the asst. yr. 1974-75. No notice under s. 139(2) was issued. There were also no applications for extension of time. The two returns were furnished only on 15th Feb., 1975. The explanation of the assessee before the ITO and the AAC was that the firm's returns could not be finalised till then and hence the delay. The returns of the firm were furnished on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reasonable cause also penalty need not have been imposed on the assessee particularly in the light of the principles contained in the Supreme Court decision in Hindustan Steel Ltd. 3. We are told that after the appellant order was passed the assessee had for these two years moved the CIT not by way of revision but for waiver of penalty and that these applications are pending before the CIT. In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X