Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued ...


Tribunal Voids Assessment Orders for 2011-12 & 2012-13 Due to AO's Lack of Jurisdiction; 1% Income Addition Deleted.

November 23, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and void ab initio. The amendment to Section 153C with effect from April 1, 2017, had prospective effect, clarified by CBDT Circular 2/2018. The AO could only reopen assessments for the preceding six years from the year of satisfaction recorded on September 26, 2018, i.e., assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19. Consequently, the impugned assessment orders for 2011-12 and 2012-13 were quashed. Regarding the reopening of assessments of other persons u/s 153C, the Tribunal held that the AO failed to record valid satisfaction year-wise and narrate specific documents relied upon for initiating proceedings. The satisfaction note lacked details of information and failed to establish a direct correlation between the incriminating material and the relevant assessment years. The addition of 1% representing income from commission and bank statement credits/debits was deleted due to the absence of valid satisfaction recorded, following the precedent in M/s Marconi Infratech.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity and scope of remand order of ITAT - At this stage, the learned counsel for the assessee contended that the Tribunal did not specify the years for which the...

  2. Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot...

  3. ITAT invalidated assessments under s.153C read with s.153A for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13. The AO recorded satisfaction note on 25.09.2018, making AY 2019-20 the relevant...

  4. ITAT held that assessment framed u/s 153C for AY 2011-12 is barred by limitation and vitiated due to lack of valid 'satisfaction note', rendering entire proceedings...

  5. The assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IC for the finished products manufactured at Unit No. III at Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, was initially allowed but later...

  6. Assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) OR 153C - The Tribunal held that the assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) for A.Y. 2012-13, based on the satisfaction recorded on...

  7. MAT Computation u/s 115JB - The amount of losses incurred by the assessee for the previous year’s 2012-13 and 2011-12 should be set off against the future income in the...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition u/s 68 on share premium received by petitioner from Gold Singapore was challenged. Reassessment proceedings initiated...

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of assessments made u/s 153C, considering the gap between the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer...

  10. Assessment - General - Processing of returns of assessment year 2011-12 - Steps to clear backlog - Cir. No. 01/2012 Dated: February 2, 2012

  11. Validity of reopening of assessment - jurisdiction of AO over the assessee for framing of assessment -The Tribunal held that, as the assessment in the case of the...

  12. The CBDT has notified "The Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board" for exemption under section 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The specified...

  13. ITAT ruled the assessment order invalid due to procedural deficiencies and lack of proper jurisdiction. The AO failed to issue mandatory notice under Section 143(2)...

  14. The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

  15. Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates