9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (1) TMI 123X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on or before 30th June, 1981 but the same was filed on 9th Sept., 1983. For the asst. yr. 1983-84, the return of income was due to be furnished on or before 30th June, 1983, but the same was filed on 5th May, 1985. The assessee's explanation was that the account books of another firm called "M/s Adam & Joseph" were impounded by the Sales-tax authorities and therefore it was not possible for it to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s of another firm with which the assessee had dealings had been either sized or impounded by the sales-tax authorities and the auditor of the assessee firm was insisting upon the production of such records for him to finalise the accounts and as a result, delay had occurred which was beyond the control of the assessee. The learned Advocate also reiterated before us the same contentions that were a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sessee need not depend upon the books of another firm for its transactions with the other firm if the transactions had been recorded as and when they took place and such recording was made true to the nature of the transaction. Such being the case one wonders why the assessee should wait for the scrutiny of the books of accounts of another firm before finalising its accounts. Even if there are dif ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ities, the assessee need not have waited for so long to finalise its accounts. If interested, it could have arranged for taking of the copies of its account with the other firm. No effort has been made by the assessee in this direction. Further the assessee can rely on its own account for the transactions with the other firm instead of looking upon the accounts of the other firm to finalise its ow ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
