HC ruled that the petitioner, not being a 'supplier' under GST ...

Supplier Status Challenge: GST E-Way Bill Penalty Reduced from Rs.7,36,490 to Rs.25,000 Under Section 2(105)

April 24, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC ruled that the petitioner, not being a 'supplier' under GST Act Section 2(105), was improperly penalized Rs.7,36,490/- for failing to generate Part-B of E-Way Bill during goods transportation for job work. The court found the penalty disproportionate, considering the petitioner had generated Part-A of E-Way Bill and provided a valid Delivery Challan. The impugned order was modified, reducing the penalty to Rs.25,000/- and directing respondents to refund the excess amount through Electronic Cash or Credit Ledger, thereby partly allowing the petition and rectifying the unjustified punitive action.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC ruled that the petitioner, not being a 'supplier' under GST ...

Supplier Status Challenge: GST E-Way Bill Penalty Reduced from Rs.7,36,490 to Rs.25,000 Under Section 2(105)

April 24, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

HC partially allowed the petition challenging GST late fee and penalty impositions. Court upheld late fee under Section 47(2) of GST Act for delayed annual return...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

HC held that a contractor cannot claim GST payment beyond rates quoted in government contracts where tender explicitly states "rates inclusive of GST & other taxes."...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - re-export of goods - misdeclaration of goods - the penalty imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is proper....

Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Entitlement to reduced penalty - total amount deposited at the time of investigation is much more than the confirmed duty demand, interest thereon and 25% penalty -...

Benefit of reduced penalty u/s 78 - the appellant had failed to deposit 25% of the imposed penalty before the issuance of show cause notice or within 30 days of...

Quick Updates: