Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (8) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... il, 2003, for admission of additional evidence under r. 29 of the ITAT Rules 1963. The learned representative of the assessee Shri Pieyush Kaushik submitted that before the Departmental authorities the assessee had filed confirmations from the American Express Bank (Luxemborg), evidencing the factum of transfer of various remittances from this account to the account of Joakim Alm and Anita Pandeya with Citi Bank, Mumbai and Delhi. According to the learned counsel, this evidence was adduced to explain the investment made by the two persons but the Revenue authorities insisted for personal accounts of these persons with the banks overseas from where two funds have been transferred into India. It is submitted that these documents could not be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed secured loan to the company. Since it could not be done, the AO treated the entire amount as unexplained cash credit under s. 68. Before the learned CIT(A) it was submitted that the genuineness of the transaction was evident from the personal bank statements of the creditors. It was also submitted that since both the creditors and directors of shareholders of the company and both of them were maintaining two accounts with Citi Bank in India, the identity of both these persons stood established. Before the learned CIT(A) fax message dt. 21st Nov., 2001 from Price Waterhouse Coopers was also filed. The learned CIT(A) has not placed reliance on this evidence on the pretext that it was simply a photocopy of the fax message which has not been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r under the law will ensure. It is, therefore, incorrect to shut out an assessee in the process of administration of justice from leading evidence to prove its case. The earlier inability to lead evidence should not be held against the assessee unless it is known to the Court or suggested to the Court or there was evidence to suspect that the evidence was fabricated. In the instant case, there was no such suggestion and, therefore, the assessee s evidence was to be admitted. The CIT(A) was, therefore, directed to examine the payment of commission afresh and to issue orders accordingly." 9. In view of the above decision, if the evidence is genuine, reliable and proves the assessee s case then the assessee is not to be denied the opportunit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cash credits. Accordingly, he confirmed the addition. The assessee took the matter further. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the learned CIT(A). The assessee preferred reference. The question referred for the esteemed opinion of the High Court was as to whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming itself to the material on record before the ITO and not admitting the fresh evidence for the purpose of examining the taxability of Rs. 27,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Hon ble High Court after considering r. 46A of the ITAT Rules held that it could not be said that AAC was not justified in refusing to give permission to adduce fresh evidence. In view of the above, it is clear that in that case the evidence was filed before th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d on pp. 1 to 11 of the paper book is admitted. 11. We have also considered the grounds, of appeal and have heard the learned counsels of the parties in relation thereto. Since we have admitted additional evidence we consider it proper to setaside the orders of the learned CIT(A) for both the assessment years in question and restore the matter back to him for deciding the issues involved in these two appeals on merits. While doing so, the genuineness of the documents admitted and their evidentiary value shall be considered by the learned CIT(A), after providing due opportunity to the AO to examine the documents and also to rebut the same by adducing evidence, if it is so required. Hence, the grounds in these two appeals shall be adjudicat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates