1978 (12) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e partners retired from the firm. The inevitable consequence of the retirement of one of the partners was that there was an automatic dissolution of the firm. The appellant filed an application in form No. 11 claiming the benefit of registration for that relevant assessment year. But the ITO and the AAC disallowed the income on the ground that there was a change in the constitution of the firm and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st day of the accounting year relevant to the asst. yr. 1972-73. The appellant was well justified in filing only Form No.11. If that was so, the authorities were not justified in refusing to grant the benefit of registration to the new firm. It was admitted that form No. 11 filed was within the statutory period and no doubt was also cast on the genuineness of the firm. We have no hesitation in hol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X