9911796707
TMI Blog1981 (5) TMI 65X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 31st October, 1980 to the Hon ble High Court for its opinion: (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the finding of the AAC that the ITO was not justified in taking action u/s. 147(b) of the IT Act, 1961. (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the finding of the A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... quashed the reassessment orders pertaining to the years under appeal. Aggrieved, the revenue came up in appeal to the Tribunal. The latter agreed with the AAC that no valid action could have been taken u/s. 147(b). There was controversy before the Tribunal as to under which clause, either cl. (a) or cl. (b) action was taken by the ITO. The Tribunal held that the action had been taken u/cl. (b) of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 979) 12 CTR (SC) 190: (1979) 119 ITR 996 (SC), the Tribunal took the view that the audit party was not competent to give any information of law. It is, therefore, clear from the order of the Tribunal that it was of the view that the audit party simply furnished the information as to the law. No information as to the fact relating to the escarpment of income was furnished by the audit party, accord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
