1984 (1) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1983, as both of them arise out of the same order of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (hereinafter called the Board), dated August 20, 1982. 2. The Enforcement Directorate alleged that during the years 1976-1980, the appellant firm being a person resident of India, entered into an agreement to pay commission and associated itself with one Bhupinder Singh, a person resident outside .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder or on behalf of the person resident outside India during the year 1977, without any general or special permission from the Reserve Bank of India and thereby contravened the provisions of Section 9(1)(d) of the Act, Still another memorandum dated September 19, 1981, was issued to the firm alleging that during the years 1976-80, it made a payment of Rs. 45,500/- to a person resident in India, b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed on the material on record. However, the penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Officer on account of the third and the fourth charge was reduced from Rs. 10,000/- to Rs. 6,000/-. Dissatisfied with the same, two appeals have been filed in this Court. S.A.O. No. 67 of 1982, has been filed on behalf of the appellant firm whereas S.A.O. No. 53 of 1983, has been filed on behalf of the department. 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X