9911796707
TMI Blog1987 (9) TMI 227X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are applying for liberty to withdraw the petition. Under normal circumstances, there would have been no further arguments. 2. However, Mr. Sethna has strenuously argued that the petitioners have made false statements on oath and an action should be taken against them for that purpose. 3. It is the submission of Mr. Sethna that in the five copies which were supplied by the petitioners to the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ully been withheld at Kandla. The petitioners are having their office at Bombay. The impact and the consequences of wrongful withholding of clearance by the respondents of the said goods at Bombay. The respondent No. 3 acts at the behest/guidance of Bombay authorities. In any view of the matter the part of cause of action has arisen at Bombay and accordingly this Honourable Court has jurisdiction ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt does not contain any mis-statement in this paragraph. It was also pointed out that the same Attorney had filed six identical petitions of which this was one. In the other five petitions, the averments in paragraph 30 are as were originally sent to the respondents. Under these circumstances, there is not the slightest doubt in the mind of the Court that a genuine mistake had in fact occurred. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... points out that in fact in respect of these very Bill of Entries, the petitioners had filed a petition in the Supreme Court which had been withdrawn and that there was no reference in this petition to those proceedings. Mr. Sethna also points out that the goods had arrived in Kandla, the Bill of Entry was filed in Kandla, the address of the petitioners on the Bill of Entry and in the petition is a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
